>>715697538
I'll take your word for it, but even so I'm not sure that's an issue that would have been caused by a credit card company recently choosing to fuck over wegfags
I guess you could argue they were caused by the same loose principle, but I'm not sure I'd really care about that either because in matters of practicality it's a separate issue with a different set of belligerents and not just one nebulous 'they' as some people here like to argue in