Anonymous
7/17/2025, 12:01:44 PM
No.715698751
>>715698040
>just taking every line, making a strawman of it and declaring yourself right
Sorry fagboy, that's not gonna bring your shit back to steam. I didn't say or even imply half of that.
My core point remains the same. Nobody likes the shit that was removed. Nobody will ever care except enthusiasts of that shit, and those enthusiasts will never convince anybody else that they're actually fighting the righteous fight by defending 'Incest Tales: Sister and Mom' lmao. The games you're fearmongering will be gone next already survived mad puritans going after them, whereas this shit lost without a fight and rightly so
I simply won't be scared by such retardation. Nobody will. Get fucking madder though, that might teach me. I can tell how much more intelligent than me you are from how affected you're getting.
>>715698089
>I would argue that the loose principle was the reason for every instance of baffling censorship we saw in completely normal games over the years
I think you might be right, yes, but I'd still argue that practically speaking it's different enough to be considered a different issue. Speaking observationally on a broader scale and not just for myself, the morality of incest weg weebshit is much more repugnant than the kind of censorship I'd presume you're speaking of.
>At any rate, I don't know why you're so fixated on this making wegfags mad
Because they're the ones who lost and I enjoy that very very much, there's nothing too deep to it
>>715698198
>because his whole argument would fall apart if he stopped assuming that everyone was just some angry wegger
I'm not here arguing with you, wegboy. I got given a win for free like manna from heaven, and I'm here soaking in some schadenfreude over some insufferably shit taste faggots.
If you're not one of them and you're just replying because you want to get mad about the principle of the matter and nothing else, then I don't care still, that's not my problem either I'm afraid
>just taking every line, making a strawman of it and declaring yourself right
Sorry fagboy, that's not gonna bring your shit back to steam. I didn't say or even imply half of that.
My core point remains the same. Nobody likes the shit that was removed. Nobody will ever care except enthusiasts of that shit, and those enthusiasts will never convince anybody else that they're actually fighting the righteous fight by defending 'Incest Tales: Sister and Mom' lmao. The games you're fearmongering will be gone next already survived mad puritans going after them, whereas this shit lost without a fight and rightly so
I simply won't be scared by such retardation. Nobody will. Get fucking madder though, that might teach me. I can tell how much more intelligent than me you are from how affected you're getting.
>>715698089
>I would argue that the loose principle was the reason for every instance of baffling censorship we saw in completely normal games over the years
I think you might be right, yes, but I'd still argue that practically speaking it's different enough to be considered a different issue. Speaking observationally on a broader scale and not just for myself, the morality of incest weg weebshit is much more repugnant than the kind of censorship I'd presume you're speaking of.
>At any rate, I don't know why you're so fixated on this making wegfags mad
Because they're the ones who lost and I enjoy that very very much, there's nothing too deep to it
>>715698198
>because his whole argument would fall apart if he stopped assuming that everyone was just some angry wegger
I'm not here arguing with you, wegboy. I got given a win for free like manna from heaven, and I'm here soaking in some schadenfreude over some insufferably shit taste faggots.
If you're not one of them and you're just replying because you want to get mad about the principle of the matter and nothing else, then I don't care still, that's not my problem either I'm afraid