>>715714440
>>715715082
The tech only imitates its training. If you're in chat (ERP) format, anything it's trained on in that format always has the members come out on top, just like it always has them come together, or specifically with ERP always moves towards sex. Likewise for establishing a protagonist in prose gives him plot armor. These natural inclinations can't be overcome by just adding
>Rule: Make sure {{user}} isn't guaranteed to succeed.
because perceived unpredictability but last-second wins are already in its natural inclination.

Instead, when you want X but you want the AI to make Y a real chance, you should define it definitively as
>{{user}} loses any duel he finds himself in
or
>Genre: Defeat, Tragedy, Humiliation
or
>Rule: No matter how well things seem to be going, girls always find a reason to break it off and cut contact with {{user}}. {{user}} can never get a girlfriend.
etc. Go much further in the context than what you actually want. The AI knows what that should look like and experiences a clash in its own inclinations, wanting to give a final win versus using any kind of defeat from training as a template to give you a defeat. It's not absolute, it just gives it the unpredictability and an inclination to undermine you rather than suck you off.