>good
The game looks great and I can run it at full HD on a 2070 super, thought I am not sure if the fps is stable I couldn't make sense of those stats and wasn't running it on Steam, just give me an FPS counter.

loading times and the time after the match is fast, faster than CoD where I just change to another screen while waiting.

The movement system is good without being too fast or arcadey like CoD, with the exception of people who exploited it and I hope they fix that.

I like the support class, the way you can move someone out of harm's way BUT sometimes you are too fast, I think they should let you choose, like you wait before reviving someone to get a speed bonus, because sure is nice to revive them almost right away but then I can't actually get them out of danger.

The vehicle's damage seems good enough
Weapons feel nice to use, not sure about the pistol, I liked pistols in BF3 but this one eh..gotta see how the other pistols compare.
Shotguns work very nicely in CQC

My 4 main complaints/worries
1) Maps are Cod-like size, they feel too small
2) Spawn killing, except for people hovering with vehicles at the spawn, so doing it on purpouse in BF3, this shouldn't be a problem, but I had it and seen it, people spawning in front of me or viceversa, this shouldn't happen here
3) Aesthetics, it looks very good but at the same time, boring, I feel like in...10 years a screenshot might get confused with some other shooter.
4) Maps don't feel like they got something distinctive right now, I liked the Bazar in BF3, but outside the mountain one they all blend in together, I don't see a Strike at Karkand or Caspian border and the destruction while it is good, even very good I'd say, I haven't seen anything really exceptional in the way is used.