>>718156350
>Yeah yeah, we've been over this.
Inside of your imagination maybe, but studios don't brag about sales numbers, call it a success, and declare they're working on DLC's+a sequel if it's a financial failure. The made up "estimated" costs for development and marketing aren't proof of anything except cope that the game somehow failed despite all evidence to the contrary.
>You would not lose 70% of your userbase if it was irrelevant
But the playerbase is buying the game even faster than they bought the first one? Sounds like the playerbase is still here.