Anonymous
8/25/2025, 9:19:02 PM
No.719026580
>>719026373
>They're both art created to get money.
Quite explicitly the opposite.
>art for capitalism is made to appeal to a market
To be sold to that market, yes.
>publicly funded art is made to appeal to policymakers
No. That's American brainrot talking.
>True art is made by passion, and passionate people will make art whether they receive funding or not.
Not if they're dead of starvation or spending all their time struggling to make a living.
Literally the entire point of art funding and patronage is to enable people to live off of art they want to make and thus enable people to become artists. This, in turn, improves the culture of your society.
It's basic Civ shit.
>They're both art created to get money.
Quite explicitly the opposite.
>art for capitalism is made to appeal to a market
To be sold to that market, yes.
>publicly funded art is made to appeal to policymakers
No. That's American brainrot talking.
>True art is made by passion, and passionate people will make art whether they receive funding or not.
Not if they're dead of starvation or spending all their time struggling to make a living.
Literally the entire point of art funding and patronage is to enable people to live off of art they want to make and thus enable people to become artists. This, in turn, improves the culture of your society.
It's basic Civ shit.