>>723235640
>lol no fucking way, is their review just based on that?
Yup. And they were not the only one, I'm afraid.

This one Finnish gaming magazine literally released an apology-review 2 years later, openly admitting that they didn't realize they only played the prologue chapter, and thus bashed it as an "overpriced, short, too easy game, with nothing memorable or different to speak of". Not surprisingly, their score jumped several digits on the second try.