Anonymous
10/23/2025, 5:45:03 AM
No.723940365
>>723895752
Accurate. There's not a single, modern monitor technology that isn't severely compromised by various issues and caveats.
>>723896007
Making the screen flicker wouldn't help in any way. OLED burn-in, despite the common misconception, isn't some particular effect that only appears after the image has been static for some long period of time. OLED burn-in is literally just wear from usage. All that matters is the total cumulative time spent displaying particular images. If you display static images AT ALL, then the pixels are going to wear unevenly while those static images are displayed. It doesn't matter if the screen flickers or you take breaks and then return to the same static image once again, if total cumulative use time remains the same then the screen is still going to wear out a proportionate amount to the total time spent displaying whatever you had up on it.
All the OLED care and burn-in prevention features do is that they basically attempt to evaluate the state of the screen and then effectively reduce brightness on all other pixels in order to prevent visible patterns from showing up. Eventually they show up anyway, rather quickly if you spend a long time with static elements on screen. The monitor also slowly dims as you use it and due the different colored subpixels wearing out at different rates anyway the screen may end up slightly tinted in one color or another.
>>723899089
>try your hardest, deliberately, to cause burn-in
The image you posted is from normal work use, mostly editing documents. It is not trying to deliberately cause burn-in, the guy just replaced his work monitor with OLED and is working as he normally does while keeping track of the degradation. There is no deliberate burn-in. Deliberate burn-in would be like those tests while literally run the screen 24/7 on the same image. This is just a guy using an OLED screen for office work.
Accurate. There's not a single, modern monitor technology that isn't severely compromised by various issues and caveats.
>>723896007
Making the screen flicker wouldn't help in any way. OLED burn-in, despite the common misconception, isn't some particular effect that only appears after the image has been static for some long period of time. OLED burn-in is literally just wear from usage. All that matters is the total cumulative time spent displaying particular images. If you display static images AT ALL, then the pixels are going to wear unevenly while those static images are displayed. It doesn't matter if the screen flickers or you take breaks and then return to the same static image once again, if total cumulative use time remains the same then the screen is still going to wear out a proportionate amount to the total time spent displaying whatever you had up on it.
All the OLED care and burn-in prevention features do is that they basically attempt to evaluate the state of the screen and then effectively reduce brightness on all other pixels in order to prevent visible patterns from showing up. Eventually they show up anyway, rather quickly if you spend a long time with static elements on screen. The monitor also slowly dims as you use it and due the different colored subpixels wearing out at different rates anyway the screen may end up slightly tinted in one color or another.
>>723899089
>try your hardest, deliberately, to cause burn-in
The image you posted is from normal work use, mostly editing documents. It is not trying to deliberately cause burn-in, the guy just replaced his work monitor with OLED and is working as he normally does while keeping track of the degradation. There is no deliberate burn-in. Deliberate burn-in would be like those tests while literally run the screen 24/7 on the same image. This is just a guy using an OLED screen for office work.