>>724679552
>>724679596
Sounds like the message was "Kids don't have a good scale of quality," and so trying to judge something you played at least 10 years ago when you were still a child isn't going to have a good perspective. Replay it as an adult, compared to other games today, to get an appropriate comparison.

Or just say you enjoyed it as a kid, and don't try to talk about the objective quality of the game past that.