Anonymous
11/4/2025, 10:37:27 AM
No.724933073
When I search the internet for objectively verifiable problems, I usually find people who can communicate clearly and describe what they actually did. If I need to waterproof a roof in a heavy rain area, I can read posts from others who used bitumen membranes, torch on layers, or liquid rubber coatings. They report what failed miserably , what held up, adn stuff like not realizing condensation caused the mold under their “sealed” shed roof. It's all very civil and "normal". Same for anything that require actual competence.
But when the topic turns subjective and/or complex , everything collapses into stupidity. People parade their opinions as facts, quote garbage they don’t understand from otherwise valid studies, and twist definitions until words lose meaning. Any trace of logic evaporates into screaming retards. They can’t reason, can’t read critically, and hide their insecurity behind fake certainty since they have nothing else . The more unverifiable the issue, the louder and more delusional they get.
If you ever wade into that kind of discussion, define every term first. If you don’t, the thread will rot into this : insults, pseudo arguments, and ego battles from people allergic to clarity.
But when the topic turns subjective and/or complex , everything collapses into stupidity. People parade their opinions as facts, quote garbage they don’t understand from otherwise valid studies, and twist definitions until words lose meaning. Any trace of logic evaporates into screaming retards. They can’t reason, can’t read critically, and hide their insecurity behind fake certainty since they have nothing else . The more unverifiable the issue, the louder and more delusional they get.
If you ever wade into that kind of discussion, define every term first. If you don’t, the thread will rot into this : insults, pseudo arguments, and ego battles from people allergic to clarity.