Anonymous
6/20/2025, 12:35:33 PM
No.528128436
>>528128213
>Outside of SF's insistence on its own importance
Non existent unless you're the one self aware enough to recognize the all 17 alive and on the escape pod as the true ending.
>apparently he wrote it without having even read 2nd Scenario?
Why would you go on the internet and lie? It's Kodaka who never read Uchikoshi's scenario until like, a month pre release. Uchikoshi read all of the 1st and 2nd scenarios before developing the branches at large and writing his own scenario. Did you guys forget that Uchi is responsible for the whole 100 ending thing? Even in the routes he didn't write, he gave them a guideline and told them what to do to make this game have a semblance of coherence.
I'd argue that S.F. and it's pre required locks feel much more connected and meaningful as a story from start to end than whatever Kodaka wrote with 1st & 2nd scenario, but each to their own. Lying to prove your argument isn't a good look, though.
>Outside of SF's insistence on its own importance
Non existent unless you're the one self aware enough to recognize the all 17 alive and on the escape pod as the true ending.
>apparently he wrote it without having even read 2nd Scenario?
Why would you go on the internet and lie? It's Kodaka who never read Uchikoshi's scenario until like, a month pre release. Uchikoshi read all of the 1st and 2nd scenarios before developing the branches at large and writing his own scenario. Did you guys forget that Uchi is responsible for the whole 100 ending thing? Even in the routes he didn't write, he gave them a guideline and told them what to do to make this game have a semblance of coherence.
I'd argue that S.F. and it's pre required locks feel much more connected and meaningful as a story from start to end than whatever Kodaka wrote with 1st & 2nd scenario, but each to their own. Lying to prove your argument isn't a good look, though.