Anonymous
8/20/2025, 2:32:38 PM
No.535948251
>>535611814
>Another thing I've googled is that the waist-to-hip circumference ratio below 0.85 is healthy, while 0.65-0.7 is considered the most beautiful.
I don't know how you are gonna measure this without a simulated measuring tape, because measuring width (radius) is not the same thing at all unless human bodies are perfect cylinders. Even if you approximated the waist and hip as ovals, the ovals would have to have to have same aspect ratio to be applicable. I've seen many incorrect infographics where the ratios are based on width and not circumference which is the correct measurement.
>Another thing I've googled is that the waist-to-hip circumference ratio below 0.85 is healthy, while 0.65-0.7 is considered the most beautiful.
I don't know how you are gonna measure this without a simulated measuring tape, because measuring width (radius) is not the same thing at all unless human bodies are perfect cylinders. Even if you approximated the waist and hip as ovals, the ovals would have to have to have same aspect ratio to be applicable. I've seen many incorrect infographics where the ratios are based on width and not circumference which is the correct measurement.