Anonymous
10/18/2025, 9:30:40 AM
No.543093923
>>543090416
>Of course it’s racist.
Not really. The most immediate refutation of this is that whitewashing the non-character doesn't change a single thing about how I feel about him - that he's shallow, that he rarely has anything insightful to share, that he lacks even the agency to decide whether to save his father. The second most immediate refutation is that we already have "black-looking" examples like Lakrissa and Araj, and most people (myself included) don't have an issue with their appearance. It probably helps that neither of them has a glass eye or unwieldy horns.
>you dismiss X because you dislike X's appearance
This is a platitude. Yes, I like beautiful things and dislike ugly things - most people do. That's hardly controversial. A pretty face isn't automatically a relevant character, so that's an irrelevant tangent when the matter is strictly visual. My BG folder is full of pretty women. What does yours look like? Do you save pictures of the obese abomination in Act 2 or of the non-character? Why is that?
>Of course it’s racist.
Not really. The most immediate refutation of this is that whitewashing the non-character doesn't change a single thing about how I feel about him - that he's shallow, that he rarely has anything insightful to share, that he lacks even the agency to decide whether to save his father. The second most immediate refutation is that we already have "black-looking" examples like Lakrissa and Araj, and most people (myself included) don't have an issue with their appearance. It probably helps that neither of them has a glass eye or unwieldy horns.
>you dismiss X because you dislike X's appearance
This is a platitude. Yes, I like beautiful things and dislike ugly things - most people do. That's hardly controversial. A pretty face isn't automatically a relevant character, so that's an irrelevant tangent when the matter is strictly visual. My BG folder is full of pretty women. What does yours look like? Do you save pictures of the obese abomination in Act 2 or of the non-character? Why is that?