>>58104134
Haha nigger what the fuck lmao please
Sure
Then why hasn't anyone come to your defense either your majesty?
Maybe because people by and large don't care about shitty internet arguments.
But actually people do agree with me, I'm not the only one shitting on you. So by your own logic you're obviously in the wrong here.

Your core argument is "if things are balanced they won't have an identity" and that's just so blatantly fucking wrong that I can't believe I have to point this out to you. But balanced =/= identical.

And I don't even give a shit about balance in the first place. I just think bug is weak, and there was an opportunity to make it good in a thematic way, and that it's lame that this wasn't capitalized on.

Anyway, go ahead and pretend that I stawmanned you now. Here's you're exact quote btw: >>58103740
>>no it's not, shit game design would be making every single type equally powerful and with no identity

This is also your first stawman btw. You immediately constructed a point that nobody was making that's easy to attack.

God you're a fucking loser