>>12132369
>It is true
No it's not
>the source is The New York Times
No it's not. The article doesn't make or support the claim that "by 1988 a same speed 68020 was already at $5 dollars". You're just desperatly shitposting anything that mentions the 68k line and pretending they support the claim. Pathetic cope.
>The New York Times, you can't get more trust worthy then that.
That explains everything. Get well soon.