>>3859859
>sophistry
Whats the fallacy that has so offended you?

>>3859859
>contemporary nonsense that comes from viewing faith as inherently impractical and bound in magical thinking
Valuing a family relic that isnt more useful to you than any other sword, over a magical aid for a companion is impractical. To their religion being able to sell something to help another is a moral ought. Oddly it is not understood by you because it isn't following a modern mainstream moral view.

You have failed to address the point. *That* sword was useful in its ability to help their companions by being sold, in a way it couldn't by being used. TO the degree its use would have done so, any other sword does just as well in the hands of a high level paladin.