Anonymous
8/18/2025, 3:56:36 AM
No.103616675
>>103616272
I mean yeah, it's not crazy to think that it would be censored in a way that invites suspicion, since you're apparently a diehard fan. But it's always possible to shorten sender names and redact subjects so that no sensible info is made public. There shouldn't be much to censor anyway since it's not a personal e-mail address.
I mean yeah, it's not crazy to think that it would be censored in a way that invites suspicion, since you're apparently a diehard fan. But it's always possible to shorten sender names and redact subjects so that no sensible info is made public. There shouldn't be much to censor anyway since it's not a personal e-mail address.