Anonymous
8/18/2025, 3:56:41 PM
No.103630136
>>103630028
>You
I haven't once said that. If you can't tell, there is someone else who is also posting. My posts were a challenge for the anon claiming all homos were unprofitable to come up with 100k USD in costs incurred by Cover for Bettel to mean that they spent more on him than the 100k USD they have gained from his superchats. I note that nobody has managed to do this.
>You
I haven't once said that. If you can't tell, there is someone else who is also posting. My posts were a challenge for the anon claiming all homos were unprofitable to come up with 100k USD in costs incurred by Cover for Bettel to mean that they spent more on him than the 100k USD they have gained from his superchats. I note that nobody has managed to do this.