>>103633378
>just for money
largely for money, sure. but our tts autist isnt getting any regardless. why? there are other people with money who can use it without making everyone around them cringe. still shallow bitch territory, no argument there. but a creep with cash is worth significantly less than a non-creep with the same cash
>looks
no agument there, ethics and aesthetics are two sides of the coin that is morality. people conflate one with the other. beautiful people are given the ethical benefit of the doubt, good people are perceived as more attractive (although that takes longer to manifest etc, it is the reason "cute" is a thing. we prefer an above average girl who makes us feel special to a gorgeous one who cant open her mouth without being a cunt). looks let you get away with more than cash does.
>sense of humor cheat code
it is wonderful isnt it? it goes in both ways too. we wouldnt all assume fake pfp if someone was actually funny.
>game theory
I agree but are you sure about the men side of that? In my experience men are smarter and make more money, their wives are better looking and easier to be around. this holds true at least enough that it is commonly accepted wisdom that if a man is better looking than his wife, he is probably gay. (at least in 30 ups, fuck if I know what zoomers are up to)
I guess this is splitting hairs, your point stands, evolutionary psychology is remarkably effective at predicting long tern behaviors