>>5945649
>>5945581
>This is not "street food"
YOU'RE the retard. You think just because it's in a slightly more covered shack, even though it's literally served streetside, that it's not streetfood?
So by your definition if that exact dish/food that you're posting would be served in more shelter, then it magically is not street food anymore?
That's a shallow use of the term. It means nothing at that point.
The term street food, although admittedly a loose term, is more of a vibe and approach to food.