>>40718209
that sort of thing is implicit in most animals, mutual cooperation is common sense. theres nothing moral about it, the fact it needs to be prescribed as if by god eliminates the 'common sense' conceptions in your own mind, it forces you to act your against your nature, and that is immoral.

have you heard the phrase "patience is a virtue"?
do you think that thats true?
if youre a wolf pack eating the flesh of a deer, what does patience bring you?
so the more accurate phrase would be: 'patience is *sometimes* a virtue'
if patience is a virtue, then it would be received as "patience is [always] a virtue"
and so by telling people 'patience is a virtue' or 'love thy neighbor' you receive the same effect and saying '[always] love thy neighbor'. the same argument here applies. so if youre telling to [always] love thy neighbor, there will inevitably come circumstances where even if youre all on the same page 'morally', that isnt going to work. so by prescribing this, it actively imposes itself against ones better judgment and how they would naturally process a hostile neighbor, which makes it immoral.

there are two sets of morals, one by god and one by man. and currently, we have the wrong set. what makes it even more infuriating is that we figured all of this shit out 2500 years ago