Thread 12580148

i saw that

>>12580148 (OP)
You didn't see shit

>>12580148 (OP)
"Congress learns of SAPs only through briefings given to senior members of Congress on a "need to know" basis, such as the chairmen and ranking minority members of committees with budget authority over the SAP. The depth and level of detail of the briefings are unknown. Do lawmakers get details about delays, cost overruns, and operational effectiveness of various SAPs, or just assurances that things are going well? Do they learn enough to make rational decisions about whether to continue funding the programs? Since the informed members of Congress cannot consult independent experts about any technical aspects of SAPs they may know, they must rely on the honesty and good will of those who brief them. Critics such as Tim Weiner, a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter for the Philadelphia Inquirer, have charged that SAPs are frequently used not to protect national security but instead to hide program failures, mismanagement, waste, overly cozy relationships between defense contracts and the military brass, and even outright fraud. Such problems occur throughout government programs that are not classified and subject to public review and investigation; one can only wonder at what happens inside programs of which any meaningful public oversight is impossible."

https://thirdworldtraveler.com/FBI/Cult_Secrecy_ITSG.html

Your fortune: Good Luck

>>12580148 (OP)
cute loli :3

>>12580545
see no evil hear no evil speak no evil...
*sip*

"p89
No act of Congress created the NSA, and no statute establishes the agency or defines the scope of its permissible activities (in sharp contrast I with the CIA, which was created by an act of Congress and thus has clearly defined missions and accountability). The NSA came into being on November 4, 1952, through a National Security Council intelligence directive issued by President Harry Truman under the authority of the National Security Act of 1947. President Truman's directive consolidated the various signal interception and analysis activities of the U.S. government, including those of the military, under the umbrella of the NSA. The directive itself was classified Top Secret until the 1970s; even the name "National Security Agency" was classified for over two decades. (A joke among NSA employees at the time was that "NSA" stood for "no such agency.")
The NSA's operating authority is to gather "foreign intelligence" for the purposes of "national security." Those terms, however, have never been precisely defined and are open to broad and creative interpretation. No law has ever been enacted by Congress to prohibit the NSA from engaging in any activity; however, Congress has enacted numerous laws prohibiting anyone from divulging information about the NSA or its activities."

https://thirdworldtraveler.com/FBI/Cult_Secrecy_ITSG.html

Your fortune: Reply hazy, try again

pat pat

>>12580545
The spindles Mason. What do they mean?

>>12580545
... the NSA maintains computerized "dictionaries" of personal names, political groups, names of criminal organizations, and other expressions. All intercepted communications are checked against these dictionaries. If there is a match between any of the dictionaries and the intercepted communication, both the sender and receiver of the communication are placed on a watch list. All future communications to and from the sender and receiver are then intercepted and analyzed. For example, suppose someone sends you an email with something that matches a name, word, or phrase in one of the dictionaries. You are then placed on a NSA watch list. Anyone to whom you send email joins the list; so does anyone who sends you emails. You get off the watch list when it is determined that you pose no threat to national security. Who determines whether you pose a threat to national security? The NSA. And no, the NSA does not have to tell anyone that you are under surveillance, nor does it need any warrant to monitor your communications.

p93
In the mid-1990s, Steve Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists ... calculated that the Pentagon's annual "black budget" was likely in excess of $30 billion."

https://thirdworldtraveler.com/FBI/Cult_Secrecy_ITSG.html

Your fortune: Outlook good