>>12608549
Accidentally closed my tab, gotta write all this again
>It's the left's faulty for overusing the term, not the right's fault for noticing.
You're right, it's the left's fault for noticing patterns in right wing ideology and praxis, not the right's fault for noticing they're being called nazis, and doubling down by using actual nazi terms like "cultural marxism" (also known as cultural bolshevism)
>what you really mean are "people who think we should have a border and immigration policy."
I've honestly seen far more people make this claim than leftists who actually do this, nor is this an exclusively republican position. Actually, everyone believes we should have a policy on borders and immigration. What do you even mean by "policy"?
Right wing positions don't exist in a vacuum. Hitler was influenced heavily by US policies on discrimination towards minority groups, he even said as such. It's safe to say that the American public was cozied up towards certain ideas over time that had some similarities to nazi policies simply because a lot of those ideas (xenophobia, nationalism, bigotry) were the result of decades of conditioning.
People know the original nazis were repulsive, and don't respond kindly to the stereotypical nazi aestetic, but they thought that the nazis were just evil monsters who were long since defeated, not the products of certain ideals that never left many western countries.
So, fascism built itself up again, unchecked. And here we are. We never called everyone nazis, we simply noticed the storm that was coming.
