You may ask the Wolf one question.

What do you ask?

>>16693473 (OP)
How do you know whether you're computational model of the world is true or just the way the world is computing you to think?

>>16693494
I don't.

I wouldn't have said anything. I would have sit down and listened and that's what no one did.

Wolfram is like an over the top anti-semitic caricature. He makes researchers working for him sign over the credit for any discoveries. Not just the rights but the credit as well. Imagine somebody winning a nobel prize because they have the best ip lawyers. And his big physics insight? What if the universe... is le computable

>>16693685
The ruliad bra

>>16693473 (OP)
"are you a cellular automaton?"

>>16693827
https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2021/11/the-concept-of-the-ruliad/
>How should we think about the ruliad mathematically? In many ways, the ruliad is more an object of metamathematics than of mathematics itself. For in talking about the effects of all possible rules, it in a sense transcends individual mathematical theories—to describe a kind of metatheory of all possible theories.
Drivel. The guy can't diagonalize

>>16693473 (OP)
Nails, meet hammer: the guy