in the wrong here?

She was

>>16694996 (OP)
>Nobel prize winning physicist, an excellent communicator whose lectures and writing were praised by students and peers alike
Vs
>Literally who JewTuber
She was.

>>16694996 (OP)
feynman was a midwit with a confirmed iq of 120

>>16695001
>>16695003
What did Feynman invent?

>>16695008
What too many IQ threads do to a motherfucker.

>>16695011
I'm guessing your iq is in the sub 100 range

>>16695010
He only invented pissing of feminists apparently

>>16694996 (OP)
You for making a social media screencap thread about some e-celeb grifter

>>16695010
Feynman path integral for QM

>>16695127
These days, vile midwits who xan never make a name for themselves, seek out important figures in the history of science to shittalk people long since dead, who can no longer defend themselves from defamatory and simply false statements.

>>16695010
>What did Feynman invent?
Feynman diagrams and the path integral picture of quantum mechanics. Both are techniques to calculate particle interactions. Im aware that other people have invented more modern analogs of feynman diagrams

>>16695008
>he thinks midwit is a moniker exclusively for range
The word is primarily about ego and attitude.
How many times did you study for the online test?

>>16695010
Path integrals and the parton model. Was one of the first people to renormalize quantum electrodynamics alongside Schwinger and Tomonaga. Made a major contribution to the renormalization efforts in QCD/gravity by coming up with Fadeev-Popov ghosts, at least heuristically.

>>16694996 (OP)
>Hour long yapping video
Why would someone do this? I get during the pandemic that everyone was online, but why now? There's surely no way she's making money off of this, right? She has to be some kind of plant

>>16695520
>why would women yap and complain for attention?
Geez, what a mystery.

>>16694996 (OP)
i can smell her snatch from here

>>16695540
what does it smell like?

>>16695546
a vinegary sour smell.. she has been sitting for hours recording and editing in polyester joggers..

>>16695552
gee doc im gonna nees a feynsmell diagram to describe thatt snifferaction

>>16694996 (OP)
ew, lack of any sort of creativity. she parrots shit but zero original ideas. disgusting

>>16695552
>joggers
>not some kind of tight pants
Ya blew the erotic image.

>>16695452
I'm not interested in the excuses of coping midwits. Your iq must be 95.

>>16694996 (OP)
does she name the jew?

>>16695678
Kek yeah I had originally put lycra yoga pants but changed it to be more frumpy/nerdy

>>16695516
>Was one of the first people to renormalize quantum electrodynamics alongside Schwinger and Tomonaga
sorry but renormalization was developed before that, by Baron Ernst Carl Gerlach Stueckelberg von Breidenbach zu Breidenstein und Melsbach

>>16695748
just go read his wikipedia article

>>16695003
>authority fallacy

>>16694996 (OP)
it was more against the cringe lords who base their personalities over the popsci view of feynman and she was right.

>>16695748
You’re confusing actually renormalizing QED and formalizing the renormalization “group”. Wilson and a ton of other people are also credited for the latter.

>>16694996 (OP)
Feynman for creating a bunch of pseudo-intellectual retards that think watching kurzgesagt videos poses for intellectual capacity.

>>16696082
People who watch Feynman do not watch Kuckzwgagt

>>16696084
keep telling yourself that.

>>16696087
Never met someone who said they liked both.

>>16694996 (OP)
>>16695001
For anyone who didn't watch the video, like these chucklefucks, she pointed out that much of feynman's mythological legacy was built by this beta cuck guy who had a crush on him or something and wrote a bunch of books about feynman. She says that feynman himself was probably alright.

>>16696094
Meanwhile, in reality, he was the youngest member of the Manhatten project, a nobel laureate, critical piece of the puzzle in solving/communicating what happened with the Challenger, experimented with teaching pedagogy that, while a failure by his own admittance was wildly successful in building intuition among physicists, and created a legacy as the great explainer. This was all before that simp you mentioned. Angie, of course, fails to mention this because her agenda was to tear down the legacy of the evil womanizer Feynman. Oh, but she included a line or two in an hour+ fucking monologue saying "eh he's probably alright BUT ANYWAY HERE'S WHY HE'S EVIL". Ironically enough, you're simping her word as gospel while trying to deboonk Feynmans legacy on the grounds that a simp worshipped him.

>>16696094
Did she mention anything about his thoughts on brasilians?

>>16696094
By books on feynman does she mean the transcripts of his recorded anecdotes such as "Surely You're Joking Mr Feynman?"?

>>16695867
did you ever meet one of those guys she describes? I didn't.

>>16696094
she is also wrong with that. Feynman's legacy was built by his accomplishments and books he wrote

>>16694996 (OP)
I’ve actually met this woman before. I had no idea she was a content creator until one of my friends showed me a video. I was at school the same time as she was around 10 years ago. She was very nice, despite having an absolute asshole of an advisor. She’s extremely short.

>>16694996 (OP)
I mean it is correct that this guy made a lot of money writing and embelleshing Feynmann biographies.

>>16694996 (OP)
Usually the woman is in the wrong, so I'll go with that.

>>16695748
>it was schwinger!
>no it was .*berg.*
what's the difference lmao

>>16694996 (OP)
wtf you can't just criticize God's chosen people on their own website

>>16696959
Excellent point. Can we call out Angela for antisemitism? Feynman was famously Jewish.

>>16696960
just use Youtube's report function for antisemitism, they will then forward relevant data to Unit 8200

>>16694996 (OP)
thats a man

>>16696960
kind of just assumed she was Jewish myself.

>>16696972
Damn, she's even worse than an antisemite -- she's a self-hating Jew

>>16695435

Paul Dirac was the first person to write down the propagator as a path integral.

>>16696955
Well, yeah.
They are both German, so it's probably not much to you.

>>16697334
He wasn’t. He worked in the Hamiltonian representation, which isn’t Lorentz invariant. Propagators are Lorentz invariant.

>>16694996 (OP)
For people who didn't watch the video, it's not about Feynmann's physics. It's about him being very Jewy.
>She didn't say anything about Jews.
No, but I did.

>>16696955
Berg was swiss, schwinger was a jew

>>16697334
Oh, it was all that episode of putting the lagrangian in an exponent?
Most likely path followed a classical trajectory, less likely paths followed others

>>16697567

Most generally, the propagator is a Green's function for the Schrodinger equation and - as Dirac found - it could be written as a path integral over momenta and configuration variables. You can find this in his quantum mechanics book which predates Feynman's physics career.

Note that writing down the propagator as a path integral is formally possible whether the Hamiltonian comes from a field theory with Lorentz symmetry (and you're dealing with a functional Schrodinger equation) or from a quantum mechanical system (with the Schrodinger equation you're probably familiar with).

And, of course, the phase space path integral is more fundamental than the one written in the Lagrangian formalism.

>>16699082
Dirac didn’t use these words and he was just using the completeness relations to write out a formal expansion in the Hamiltonian formalism. This is NOT a path integral, because path integrals are covariant and gauge-covariant. Hamiltonian mechanics are neither of these things. Path integrals treat space and time on equal grounds and respect gauge symmetry. If you’ve ever actually taken a basic graduate QFT course, you would know that none of this is possible in the canonical quantization formalism. The two are very different.