I hate how when people try to explain time dilation, they use an example of someone falling into a black hole or another gravitationally dense object and they say "the person would notice that their wristwatch is ticking slower". As if a physical object like a wristwatch is, by magic, completely bound to measure the passing of time no matter what and so its speed would be affected by time dilation.

Atomic clocks sure, but wristwatches no.

>>16695372 (OP)
Like, stay on earth Sweaty...

When someone tries to create a whole field of study (or a grift) around something that was only observed once and will never be seen again

>>16695396
y keep this turd on ur pc?

>>16695478
>>16695470

>>16695372 (OP)
i hate how people marvel at space when it should be common knowledge by now that we'll never explore anything wonderful about it anytime soon or in the future

>>16695493
this
we're never leaving the milky way that's for sure
probably not the solar system

>>16695493
I marvel at space because it's cool and I like it :)

>>16695623
but what IS it?

>>16695624
Spaaaaaaaaaace

>>16695624
Medium filled with various fields interacting, that we call "laws" or "constants", apparently still expanding from the very first "kick" from Big Bang and accelerating that expansion for unknown reasons, most likely because as mass tends to clump together, there's nothing stopping expansion from speeding-up anymore.

>>16695632
Big bang theory was recently refuted
https://youtu.be/Xb69yPNgX-Q

redshift is just tired light
crackpot theory today, but it will be accepted within 25-50 years, as it was 50 years ago.

>>16695635
By YouTube videos where every failure can now voice his opinion, but don't explain many hundreds of discrepancies introduced by their "theory"
I think there are better ways to learn things, instead of complete mumbo-jumbo, like electric universe for an example.

>>16695645
He doesn't have a theory, just saying the current theory is tripping over itself trying to stay consistent when it's clearly not.

god I hate you reddit faggots
just because I say something is wrong doesn't mean I have to have the answer to what's right. My ability to see your logical shortcomings doesn't mean I must have all the answers. You're just addicted to answers. Let the unknown be unknown.

im glad you made this thread about time dilation, I'll be the first to admit I'm a certified midwit with a 120 IQ but I've never heard time dilation explained in a way that makes sense to me that wouldn't in concept be the death of the organism that is experiencing time sped up. Like cooper in Interstellar being on that planet and in a few hours its several years to the black man up in orbit, how can he biologically age and somehow Cooper is frozen in stasis because of gravitational pressure? or whatever else causes time dilation, I simultaneously need a for idiots explanation but not one that just uses a metaphor or just points to the concept of things up in the atmosphere having watches tick seconds differently. Would life forms survive dilation that extreme? Forgive me for trying to understand

>>16695372 (OP)
Mate my dimension has not atomic clocks, there is no way to find out further what they are, Ive seen the words a few times. No one says! What r they?

>>16695372 (OP)
I was mindlessly scrolling through YouTube shorts and I came across a clip from a shit British film in which this boffin fellow pointed to a tree and said "that's where Newton invented gravity"

>>16695372 (OP)
atomic clocks were claimed in the 1960's with an attempt of belief of recording the unit of time known as the second as a 9ghz frequency from an isotope of cesium.

we don't even have computers 60 years later than run at 9ghz.

good luck recording that correctly.

(gay lies for faggots and retards who get overwhelmed by big science words and large numbers)