How about another joke, Fraenkel?
>a busy beaver Turing machine with 636 states will halt if ZFC is inconsistent
https://github.com/CatsAreFluffy/metamath-turing-machines/blob/master/output_zf2.txt

>>16700065
ngl, I feel like diogenes would be pro-trans if anything if we extrapolated that argument to the modern day. This pic doesn't really make sense.

>>16700021 (OP)
>Turing machine with 636 states
You can cram that into a universal TM with just a few states, can you clarify what you mean?

>>16700076
>diogenes would be pro-trans
man, your delusion skills are of the charts, really?, the man that plucked some feather of a bird & said "behold, a man" would be pro-trans?, if anything you lot have done the "plucking" necessary for him to point at you and declare "behold, a woman"

>>16700076
diogenes was hardly pro-anything. he was mostly anti-stuff. for instance, he was more anti-humans than he was pro-dog. he felt man (as in humans) had no virtue. there is zero chance he'd be pro-trans. he would absolutely be anti-trans, but only insofar that it falls into anti-human. that is, he wouldn't have seen being trans as any more despondent than he had seen every other human as devoid of virtue. though he probably would have found a certain respect in their public depravity denigrating social norms. recall that diogenes had no problems masturbating in public, purely to send a message

>>16700076
Diogenes was the kind of guy obsessed with truth and fact over any and conventions, he would rip them a third asshole.

>>16700082
>the man that plucked some feather of a bird & said "behold, a man" would be pro-trans?
Yes.

>>16700085
>though he probably would have found a certain respect in their public depravity denigrating social norms
That's what I'm saying. The entire logic behind transness is that gender is a social construct. Diogenes would have been a gender abolitionist if only to troll.

The idea that Plato would have been making the pro-trans argument is itself farcical, but the idea that Diogenes would have argued for strictly constructed gender roles is ridiculous.

>>16700100
>Diogenes was the kind of guy obsessed with truth and fact over any and conventions, he would rip them a third asshole.
What argument do you think is being made from conventions? Or do you think people actually look to gamete size when determining what gender to use for other people?

>>16700113
Imagine a universe where it were eggs or GTFO and not tits or GTFO.

That's supposed to be were, right? Not was? That shit always feels marbly to me.

>>16700113
>i'm saying diogenes would have been pro-trans
>no, he would have been anti-human which is not pro-trans
>YES THAT IS WHAT I AM SAYING
you're a dunce. diogenes would have torn you a new asshole.

>>16700132
>you're a dunce
You're the one explaining why Diogenes would have been pro-trans while arguing he wouldn't have been.

I didn't say he would have been pro-trans people.

>>16700133
if you think i said he'd be pro-trans, then your reading comprehension is dogshit. >>16700076
>I feel like diogenes would be pro-trans
>>16700133
>I didn't say he would have been pro-trans people.
your logical abilities are even worse

>>16700145
If you don't understand the difference between an ideological argument and the people making or benefitting from that argument, then I can't help you. I'm not sure anyone can.

>>16700147
there is no way to be "pro-trans" without being "pro-trans people".

>>16700152
>there is no way to be "pro-trans" without being "pro-trans people"
Now that's obviously not true. I'm pro-cis, but I think you're an asshole.

>>16700165
that's like saying "i'm pro-abortion, but i'm anti-abortion against you because you had an abortion and you're an asshole". i repeat myself: your logical abilities are atrocious.

>>16700147
please stop...i'm suffering for you

>>16700076
Diogenes is making fun of a definition of man, the definition was iirc like a fetherless biped so he plucked a chicken to show how stupid it was, now if diogenes did the same for what some people define a woman as he would cut the dick off a child and hold it up to be laughed at as a humorous example,

>>16700168
>that's like saying "i'm pro-abortion, but i'm anti-abortion
No. It's not. Both because the terms are pro-choice and pro-forced birth and because you can't be pro and anti the same thing.

Now, you can certainly be pro-choice and think a person or people that have had an abortion are a shitstain. That's just a thing that is objectively true. Many people are shitstains, including people that have had abortions.

>your logical abilities are atrocious.
You're literally arguing being pro-choice means you can't hate any woman that has ever had an abortion, you fucking idiot.

>>16700260
Nah, if you're suffering, that's a you issue.

>>16700272
>Diogenes is making fun of a definition of man, the definition was iirc like a fetherless biped so he plucked a chicken to show how stupid it was, now if diogenes did the same for what some people define a woman as he would cut the dick off a child and hold it up to be laughed at as a humorous example
I feel like holding up a child's severed dick would make more sense as a humorous example of the definition of a man, than a woman. It produces the smaller of the two human gametes after all. And it's not like you need a whole body or something since the definition starts at conception.

>>16700295
Diogenes didn't hold up the feathers he plucked off the chicken thus he is not holding up the dick, logic and reading comprehension are not very strong with you

>>16700295
You reek of reddit.

>>16700065
first post worst post
thread was successfuly derailed, good job nigger

>>16700298
>Diogenes didn't hold up the feathers he plucked off the chicken thus he is not holding up the dick
I know that's not what you meant, but you opened the door to me twisting your words by using it to refer to a child. Why would I not walk through?

>>16700349
Weird. I'm fapping in the bath. I should reek of piss, cum, and soap. You sure you aren't just smelling yourself? I don't know what reddit reeks of.

>>16700355
kek

>>16700355
poltards just can't stop themselves from screeching TRANNIEEEE all the time

>>16700076
I feel like all of the classic Greek Philosophers would be massive stoners if they were around today. I don’t think they took themselves as seriously as modern academics think they did. Plato would be a Joe Rogan regular

>>16703939
>I don’t think they took themselves as seriously as modern academics think they did
Socrates had zero chill and Pythagoras and his followers were insane.

>>16703961
That is true. I think philosophy to some degree was something that was done for fun though. I mean look at Plato’s Symposium. The whole thing takes place at a party. They’re getting drunk and bantering about sex. It’s an ancient podcast episode. A lot of these guys had real jobs too.

>>16700113
>The entire logic behind transness is that gender is a social construct
Then why do they shell out money for sex hormones

>>16703144
Probably because you won't stop forcing your bedroom kinks on all of society and demanding access to female-only spaces because you're just predators.

You should've kept it in the "privacy of your own bedroom" as you promised to do, but now you demand people play along with your perversions or else you want them arrested for it.

Not even a /pol/tard and you're obviously a newfag tourist, but that won't stop you from screeching POOOOL everywhere you go all the time every time you see an opinion you don't like.