Thread 16701006

>276 IQ
Atheistbros how do we respond without sounding mad?

https://x.com/yhbryankimiq/status/1935171190827667641

>>16701006 (OP)
>study for iq test
>get highest iq

>make up fake organizations
>give yourself gold medals and awards from said organizations

this guy (and koreans in general) are full of shit

>>16701006 (OP)
Seems to be common with those with ultra high IQs. The brain fuck is deciding if they really believe it or simply understand the civilizing effect religion has on society, so they promote it to make the world a better place for themselves.
>But religious wars!
Almost all religious wars are fought for the same reasons why non-religious wars are fought, but with a veneer of religion coated on to motivate the pawns to participate.

>>16701006 (OP)
Exceeding 150 for any appreciable period of time is painful. The brain self limits to avoid damage.
There is a hard limit on functional IQ. Higher numbers are fake and gay, even if achievable.

>>16701016
I'm only 140 and realized how important religion was pretty early on, still unsure what it is. Guys like Kim and Langan seem to have a pretty fundamentally based logic behind their beliefs.

>>16701006 (OP)
All an IQ test tells you is how well you did on an IQ test.

>>16701006 (OP)
"It's pronounced Allah, idiot."

my iq is probably below 130 yet i managed to get my bachelors and masters and did research and worked for my university and guess what? i've been working with super smart prodigies and they couldn't handle shit or come up with something new or interesting or even revolutionary stuff. I've seen so much wasted potential going to shit

>>16701006 (OP)
he discredit IQ tests better than Obama discredited Nobel prize

>>16701006 (OP)
I am high IQ and I believe that ancient Egyptian theology is the most correct religious framework that humanity has ever achieved

>>16701031
>anyone that references allah
>not mad
kek, good one. wrong answer, but still funny.

>>16701049
>Kraut detected
>opinion automatically discarded

>>16701049
>look at all these old books I bought for fifty cents when the uni library went digital-only and sold everything

>>16701122
uhm, whats wrong with that?

>>16701124
Buying shit doesn't prove you're smart.

>>16701126
I never said i was, buddy

>>16701132
You're a Kraut though, so your opinion is automatically discarded.

>>16701140
Just because i know enough german doesn't mean i am german. There are people out there knowing multiple languages, pal

>>16701026
This is cope (83 iq btw)

>>16701006 (OP)
call him a faggot. IQ is based off memory. you could have an IQ of 500 and you still wouldn't know the ultimate question or the answer to the question. guys a fucking mook

>>16701006 (OP)
Ask "why?"

>>16701006 (OP)
Retard's not even smart enough to use a serial comma.

>>16701006 (OP)
It is impossible for him to have an IQ of 276. The highest IQ it is possible to have in a population of 8 billion is 195.

>>16701006 (OP)
If only there were a way to prove it. Oh wait that’s the point of the ‘mystery of faith,’ there is no proof but they believe it anyway. And we know that all “useful” knowledge has a basis in reality (observation). And I don’t need the Bible to know that treating someone how I’d like to be treated is good/“good”

>>16701235
>I don’t need the Bible to know that treating someone how I’d like to be treated is good
Without god the definition of "good" is totally up to personal opinion. Name whatever particular evil degenerate shit you can think of and there's some asshole on this planet who thinks it's "good" and there's no way to prove him wrong without invoking god or a functional equivalent.

>>16701018
there's a reason why the standard tests cap out at 160; beyond that it's simply just faster processing; they get the right answer more quickly, that's all.

>>16701006 (OP)
>>16701011
fpbp
He's Korean. They exaggerate about everything.

>>16701006 (OP)
He believes
Big difference

>>16701149
Nice try, but you won't fool us.

>>16701006 (OP)
if you've ever heard Chris Langan - one-time "Guinness world record holder" for highest measured IQ - speak, you'd know IQ tests are bullshit because he's a bloviating fucking retard.
so it is with this spastic.

>>16701245
>Without god the definition of "good" is totally up to personal opinion.
retards treat this like an axiom despite it being one of the most elementary fallacies in all of Philosophy.

>>16701006 (OP)
Chink worshipping a white prophet

Lmaooo

proof high IQ doesnt mean common sense. christanity isnt even the oldest religion

>>16701006 (OP)
Aliens are the real gods.
147 IQ here.

>>16701006 (OP)
>crippling amounts of pattern recognition cause you to seek patterns even when none exist
gee

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_detection

>>16702370
>a white prophet
he said nothing about Hitler

>>16702358
>calling people retards is an argument
Deciding what's "good" always boils down to an appeal to some intangible authority whose wisdom can only be accurately interpreted and bestowed onto the masses by experts. Calling the authority "God" or "ethics" makes no fundamental difference, it just means different groups of "priests" get to shame everyone for doing things they don't like.

>>16702370
He's Jew-Roman

>>16702556
>calling people retards is an argument
you're not worthy of a fucking argument.

>>16702590
You decided to argue when you replied. You just did a terrible job of it.

>>16701006 (OP)
>iq tests are capped at like 160
>I HAVE THE HIGHEST IQ EVER RECORDED

>>16701245
>and there's some asshole who
...is fucking lying, to himself and others, as he is unable to think long term enough to evaluate the negative effects of his actions.

>>16701006 (OP)
>Jesus Christ is God
I'm not even religious but that's just plain wrong, he is the son of God not God himself, saying bullshit like that would get actual Christians mad at you probably.

>>16702596
>You decided to argue when you replied
I did no such thing. I stated that you're leaning on a tired, old fallacy and you decided to have a meltdown.
The "argument" was over right >>16702358 here.

>>16702606
>the argument was over when I called him a retard then asserted without evidence that some other unknown person had already deboonked it
k

>>16702603
I think the link is more like when you are dreaming. The you in your dream is you. And so it is here in the mind of God.

>>16702601
>negative effects

>the definition of "good" depends on the definition of "bad"

now define bad

>>16702615
>literally begging me to strawman
Adding "harm and "self interest" to the list of things you don't know you don't know.
Playing rules lawyer with a side of gaslighting doesn't prove your point, it just reminds everyone that you're a simpleton.
>but I like smashing my hand with a hammer, that means it's good

>>16702626
>>but I like smashing my hand with a hammer, that means it's good
Hundreds of millions of people and most western governments - most of them atheist either openly or de facto - consider unnecessary bodily mutilation to be an indispensable human right.

Next.

>>16702631
>arguing conditional benefit without regard for the conditions that create said benefit
You are not fit for purpose. Return to monkey, monkey.

>>16702635
retard

>>16702611
It's not my job to distill the entire history of Ethics for (You).
Go read some books. The humanities are of vital importance to any scientist worth the resources their body uses.

>>16702641
>the argument was over when I told him not to @ me again until he read a fucking library
lol
>he humanities are of vital importance
LOL

No serious IQ test gives a score higher than around 160. Anything above 140 is just there to inflate the egos of Mensa autists.

It's fucking over. I guess I'm converting to Christianity now, I have no other choice.

>>16701284
They cap out at 160 because they calibrate them with real world results and it's practically impossible to get enough data to accurately go farther out on the bell curve than that. It was easy for the old-style ratio IQs, you just gave the test to older kids.

>>16702661
I think the people who brag about their 6 gorillion IQs use the ratio scale, which has a different distribution with a fatter tail (lognormal with sd=0.15). A 160 on the normal scale would be 182 on the ratio scale, and a 276 on the ratio scale is a 201 on the normal scale.

>>16702667
Of course, those people will use any kind of extrapolation they can come up with. That’s why I referred to *serious* tests.

>>16702672
The tests are "serious", they're just old.

>>16701006 (OP)
Christians needing validation for their religions existence by using this random retard online who claims to have 2 gorillion IQ is hilarious. But on a further note, even if this guy was the smartest person in history ever, he's still limited to the same knowledge as everyone else and absolutely nothing on Earth can prove or disprove God. Some people supposedly feel "spiritually" that God exists somewhere but that's most definitely not definite proof of his existence so I don't know why he's so confident. Most likely his confidence stems from the fact that every retard sucks up to any person that they perceive to be more intelligent and supports their own oh so smart idea. This happens with every religion, political ideology (communism, far-righters) etc. Easiest grift ever.

>>16702675
>were serious
Brofix.

>>16702678
They were professionally written and calibrated same as today's tests, and I personally wouldn't argue that 2020s psychologists are any more competent than 1970s psychologists.

>>16702683
True. In the past, there were psychologists with IQs of 182, whereas nowadays the best barely reach 160. It's a significant drop when you analyze the psychologists themselves instead of the methodologies.

>>16702644
>Without god the definition of "good" is totally up to personal opinion.
this is why you need the Humanities. so you don't come across like a worthless pseud.

>>16702747
Are you stuck in a loop?

>>16701006 (OP)
>276 iq
>17.7(8) sigmas above average
>1 in 10^70
nah that’s bs

>>16702705
160 is 1 in 31,560. That's still very good. 182 is 1 in 43,508,721, which is kind of absurd to expect. There are only 185 or so people that smart on Earth.

I believe in God, but I don't give a fuck about Religions. What Am I?

>>16703098
An irreligious theist

>>16703102
I looked it up and specific word for it is "Deism"

>>16701006 (OP)
You lost, Christ is King!

>>16701011
>>16701052
>>16701165
>>16701214

>>16703105
Deism is slightly different. Irreligious theists still believe in supernatural events and things like miracles while deists don't. If you don't believe in supernatural happenings then you're a deist, if you do but don't follow religion you're an irreligious theist

>>16703118
>me so smart! me post wojak to defend le iq!

(276-100)/15=11.73

Lets say it is 12.
Now, lets calculate 12 SD from the mean line...

Welcome to 10^n with n greater than -12.

We are in territory where a measurement error is nearly sure more probably than the actual result.

To make it short for you:
The claim that a person with an IQ of 276 exist is as unlikely it even gets.
No need to worry about. This person is nearly certain an imposter.

>>16701049
We know this effect from William James Sidis.
Sometimes, they can reproduce things very well but are unable to come with something new.
>>16702354
Topkek:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Langan#Personal_views
>Langan's support of conspiracy theories, including the 9/11 Truther movement, as well as his opposition to interracial relationships, have contributed to his gaining a following among members of the alt-right and others on the far right.

He did well on SAT-scorse, too.
>>16702667
It is not that an IQ of 210 or something is impossible. At least to my knowledge.
The point is that beyond 160, the test starts to blur a lot.

Lets make a analogy:
We know humans are different with respect to high. Some people are great, some small. So, now consider a highness quitent instead of meters or inches.
Is it impossible that humans can be 5 meter? Yes, for anatomical reasons, the heart and bones would not function in this way.

Though not for statistical reasons...

>>16702676
>But on a further note, even if this guy was the smartest person in history ever, he's still limited to the same knowledge as everyone else and absolutely nothing on Earth can prove or disprove God.

Good take. Take your (you)

>>16701006 (OP)
Having very high IQ doesn't mean what you say is true.

>>16701024
Why do you cringestians post shit like this? Do you really think Heisenberg thought the Earth was created 6000 years ago? They REALLY aren't believing in that fucking fiction

>>16703337
They're just npcs. You can't reason with them. The heisenberg quote is also a fake.

>>16701006 (OP)
iq thread posters eternally btfo

>>16703337
You don't have to be a YEC to be Christian

>>16703351
Right, you just need to believe in zombies, virgins giving birth to men, and big israeli skydaddy.

>>16703355
You do have to believe in the miracles of God, yes.

I may not have a 276 IQ but I'm pretty sure that if I did I would use words like "cringestian".

>>16703181
>>16703126
>>16703337

How did he verify his IQ
276 seems a bit too extreme

>>16703550
>I was filtered and I too stupid to answer
A sad fate...

>>16701016
>>But religious wars!
>Almost all religious wars are fought for the same reasons why non-religious wars are fought, but with a veneer of religion coated on to motivate the pawns to participate.
But what about child mutilation!
Also your cope doesn't account for how often religious people instigate and foment sectarian wars, the bank of vatican with its rothchild executives are certainly no stranger to funding foreign wars.

>>16703357
Which is cringe, antiscientific, and schizophrenic

>>16702641
>>16702747
Researchers without at least a basic grasp of epistemology are akin to those without at least a basic grasp of statistics. Absolute meme automatons. But epistemology does not really belong among Humanities.