>tao calls perlman a "chump" says his paper was "cute" on lex's podcast

>>16701098 (OP)
Why is there a Neanderthal in the middle?

>>16701103
not sure if you're referring to this, but jews do have the highest percentage of neanderthal admix

>>16701128
no they don't the papers I've seen only point to asutralods as the highest admix percentage

he didn't say that

>>16702512
he basically did

>>16702735
>he did if you selectively reduce what he actually said to something he didn't say

>>16701098 (OP)
Why did Tao become an AI grifter? Did he hope AI will give a semi-useful result like Project Polymath? Then he can again just swoop in and solve a problem based on that result?
Mathematicians only pursue individual glory and fame. They disgust me.

>>16704963
>Mathematicians only pursue individual glory and fame.
Who doesn't?

>>16702735
post the timestamp or it didn't happen

>>16701098 (OP)
> a kike and a chink discuss another kike
Do they at least explain what that conjencture is about and make an attempt to translate it into layman's terms?

>>16704963
Fine, I'll bite. He's using it because it's useful and it's the way professional mathematician will be doing research in the future (5 years from now or less). If you consider the generation being born now won't have any idea what the world was like before AI and will be reliant on it, you can extrapolate that in 20 years doing research in math with an AI assistant + Lean will become the standard.

>>16701146
>asutralods as the highest admix percentage
Australoids are mostly mixed with Denisovans, not Neanderthals.