>>16703478 (OP)Why did god make these particles so non-sensical?
>>16703490Because they are not fundamental. Many of these decay to another
>>16703496Quarks have never been observed.
>>16703478 (OP)Real men call gen 3 quarks truth and beauty.
>>16703508Threatening eternal suffering for exposing UNDENIABLE truth.
>And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.>And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
>>16703499ACKCHYUALLY
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.092001
>>16703478 (OP)I don't like that there are 17 of them.
That number feels wrong.
>>16703563Then go smash some of them at ever higher energies until you find some more. Or just count antiparticles separately.
>neutrinos count three times despite neutrino oscillations
>W counts once despite +/- charges
someone needs to properly count this
>>16703560Circular, first you have to have the b quark before you can say the b quark is measuring the t quark.
>>16703478 (OP)you will never be a real gauge boson
>>16703767i'm gauging you don't have a bosom.
>>16703478 (OP)What the fuck is woke about it?
So, how do you solve the hierarchy problem?
>>16703891by ignoring made up sophistry posing as a problem?