← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16703478

21 posts 6 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16703478 [Report] >>16703490 >>16703507 >>16703563 >>16703767 >>16703838
Woke periodic table
Anonymous No.16703490 [Report] >>16703496 >>16703506
>>16703478 (OP)
Why did god make these particles so non-sensical?
Anonymous No.16703496 [Report] >>16703499
>>16703490
Because they are not fundamental. Many of these decay to another
Anonymous No.16703499 [Report] >>16703560
>>16703496
Quarks have never been observed.
Anonymous No.16703506 [Report] >>16703508
>>16703490
>Degenerate Abrahamist, having been told that the universe was a gift given to him by God to exploit, rape, and rule, is utterly confounded at the fact that the nature of the universe isn't tailored to be easily understood by him, a complete idiot.
Anonymous No.16703507 [Report]
>>16703478 (OP)
Real men call gen 3 quarks truth and beauty.
Anonymous No.16703508 [Report] >>16703516
>>16703506
enjoy hell
Anonymous No.16703516 [Report]
>>16703508
Threatening eternal suffering for exposing UNDENIABLE truth.

>And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

>And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
Anonymous No.16703560 [Report] >>16703698
>>16703499
ACKCHYUALLY
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.092001
Anonymous No.16703563 [Report] >>16703565
>>16703478 (OP)
I don't like that there are 17 of them.
That number feels wrong.
Anonymous No.16703565 [Report]
>>16703563
Then go smash some of them at ever higher energies until you find some more. Or just count antiparticles separately.
Anonymous No.16703573 [Report]
>neutrinos count three times despite neutrino oscillations
>W counts once despite +/- charges
someone needs to properly count this
Anonymous No.16703698 [Report]
>>16703560
Circular, first you have to have the b quark before you can say the b quark is measuring the t quark.
Anonymous No.16703767 [Report] >>16703771
>>16703478 (OP)
you will never be a real gauge boson
Anonymous No.16703771 [Report]
>>16703767
i'm gauging you don't have a bosom.
Anonymous No.16703838 [Report]
>>16703478 (OP)
What the fuck is woke about it?
Anonymous No.16703891 [Report] >>16703982 >>16704070
So, how do you solve the hierarchy problem?
Anonymous No.16703982 [Report]
>>16703891
nuke india
Anonymous No.16704070 [Report]
>>16703891
by ignoring made up sophistry posing as a problem?
Anonymous No.16704110 [Report] >>16704131
Anonymous No.16704131 [Report]
>>16704110
>Standard Model
>Graviton