Anonymous
6/22/2025, 1:29:06 AM No.16704709
>AI is usele---ACK
*casually solves biology as a side gig and wins the Nobel prize in your path*
*casually solves biology as a side gig and wins the Nobel prize in your path*
Replies:
Thread 16704709 - /sci/ [Archived: 803 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 1:40:08 AM No.16704718
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 2:06:28 AM No.16704740
>>16704709 (OP)
the funniest thing about this is that they were trying to find protein structures by hand.
at the rate they were going they would have been done finding every protein structure in the human body in about 100,000 years.
the funniest thing about this is that they were trying to find protein structures by hand.
at the rate they were going they would have been done finding every protein structure in the human body in about 100,000 years.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 2:16:34 AM No.16704747
>>16704709 (OP)
>solves biology
gaining insight into protein folding doesn't mean we understand biology, it is a big step though
>solves biology
gaining insight into protein folding doesn't mean we understand biology, it is a big step though
Replies:
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 2:32:33 AM No.16704752
>>16704747
There is no insight gained by AlphaFold. It's a prediction engine based on known principles.
There is no insight gained by AlphaFold. It's a prediction engine based on known principles.
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 4:34:15 AM No.16704777
>>16704740
Now that's what I call career stability
Now that's what I call career stability
ChatTDG
!!Z0MA/4gprbd
6/22/2025, 10:41:05 AM No.16704850
>>16704709 (OP)
Now if it can do the same in reverse (from a particular binding pocket amino acid configuration to a full amino acid chain) I would be pretty happy.
Now if it can do the same in reverse (from a particular binding pocket amino acid configuration to a full amino acid chain) I would be pretty happy.
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 2:43:46 PM No.16704919
>>16704709 (OP)
Whatever they are saying the guy on the right is reliable and we can't trust the guy on the left.
Can't you see the color of their eyes and skin?
>4chan expert at science evaluation
Whatever they are saying the guy on the right is reliable and we can't trust the guy on the left.
Can't you see the color of their eyes and skin?
>4chan expert at science evaluation
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:28:02 PM No.16705913
>>16704709 (OP)
How do they know they are "highly accurate" if they just made them... like... think about it.
How do they know they are "highly accurate" if they just made them... like... think about it.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:42:04 PM No.16705926
>>16705913
The work has to be checked, but it had to be checked anyway and this shit drastically cuts down on the time the work takes with very minimal downsides.
The work has to be checked, but it had to be checked anyway and this shit drastically cuts down on the time the work takes with very minimal downsides.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 10:06:34 PM No.16705943
>>16705926
So it just did something that we knew how to do before and is completely fucking pointless in every way you can think of. Nobel prize here we fucking come.
So it just did something that we knew how to do before and is completely fucking pointless in every way you can think of. Nobel prize here we fucking come.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 10:10:50 PM No.16705946
They actually got the nobel prize in biology for sloppa folding?
HAHAHAHA THE LITERAL STATE OF BIOLOGY
WHAT A "SCIENCE" LMAOOO
HAHAHAHA THE LITERAL STATE OF BIOLOGY
WHAT A "SCIENCE" LMAOOO
Anonymous
6/24/2025, 2:26:39 AM No.16706142
>>16704709 (OP) https://youtube.com/shorts/2Ki0NIZ_GwQ