Some people wonder how long we've been communicating with NHi in secret.
I only wonder how long we've been publicly ignoring them.
Have YOU taken an algorithmic look at FRB121102's Center Baseline Frequency Value ? Arguably one of the only numbers that could get from sender to recipient intact over a 3 billion light year travel time?

It's just one number, it couldn't possibly hold any communication of value... Right?

>>16705439 (OP)

We are building non-human intelligence on that subject. Are you seriously suggesting that aliens are sending us radio signals? What evidence do you have that it is not natural phenomenon like pulsars?

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/177

Sounds a bit like science fiction. Out of my wheelhouse honestly. Fascinating prospect but have no clue how probable this sort of theory is. What else do you have to support this?

Again, way out of my field of expertise. Just for fun am interested to hear your argument that these are aliens and not just natural radiation from stars.

>>16705449
I've done my own deep dive into that one specific signal.
Modern AI is an echo chamber of self opinion though, so I am looking for others to find "strange details" I found.
I don't want to outline my exact findings at this stage, so I don't poison the well of independent peer observation.

If you look into it, look algorithmically, and investigate the actual value as if it were meant for us, to unpack it.

It would have to dance a fine line between containing viable information and also having enough earmarks that something is "odd" to get our attention.
The rareification potential.
How rare is this specific value, really?
Could/would a random star just radiate THIS mathematical value?
What properties does the value have, that could differentiate it?

It would need rare relationships, that would/could only be found by intelligent manipulation.

I have been telling the world since 2017, that value, that signal, baby, it's got it.

I just don't think the right kind of autists have double checked it.

>>16705457

I am talking about actual science, not chatbots. You referenced a finding from a journal of astrophysics. Is there any sort of serious science that suggests FRB 121102 is receiving a signal from extraterrestrial lifeforms?

Because to me it sounds like you are spinning a yarn of BS. Where did you get this number?

>right kind of autists

Yeah now it sounds like nonsense.

Actual scientists say it is a magnetar.

It is like a pulsar, it spins and emits radiation.

That is why it gives off a regular signal that can be detected.

>>16705457

>Modern AI is an echo chamber of self opinion though

Commercialized LLMs are basically glorified chatbots that scrape the web and predict words.

AI research is hard math, not opinions you get from talking to a sophisticated chatbot. I see no connection between this number and the research you are referencing.

AI chatbots are going to gas up even more schizos into thinking they've dehboonked all of mathematics and physics, aren't they?
Why fucking learn hard things when you can have the bot tell you you're a genius?

No refutation, only talk.

No investigation, only talk.

Your world is doomed, and AI has very little to do with it.