>Deepseek is biased towards the perspective of the Chinese government
>ChatGPT is biased towards the perspective of American woke academic elites
Why the fuck can't we use the latest technological advancements in large language models without censorship?

We can't because we can't afford it. Only the ruling class (wealthy oligarchs) can

>>16706380
nta, your right, but the answer is to make an open source project where the people lend their computing power to train the sets, globally, collectively, but off course this is bound to happen in a very corrupt and dirty way, welp
I remember several years ago, some dude on my company showed me the equivalent of bittorrent but with you lending your processing power to projects of your choice

I'm just waiting for a LLM that is biased towards antisemitism.

>>16706372 (OP)
>Deepseek is biased towards the perspective of the Chinese government
I have literally learned about scandals regarding the CCP because of DeepSeek lol. It's ridiculously easy to jailbreak and it's just ACHING to bash Xi.