How do we get rid of these people?

>>16706640 (OP)
They have names and addresses don't they? Why then are you having to ask?

>>16706640 (OP)
That doesn't surprise me at all.

>>16706640 (OP)
What a punchable face.

>>16706657
I kneel

>>16706640 (OP)
Proof? Google has nothing.

>>16706681
Same guy or no?

>>16706640 (OP)
why is this board so full of pseud retards

>>16706695
The same reason wikipedia is full of guys like in the OP.

Political garbage like race and IQ isn't science or math. The issue with wikipedia isn't politics—the dominant political faction will always control political messaging in any sphere—it's that wikipedia has a yeast infection of old retards like this guy growing in it, who like delusional old childless cat ladies failed at life and now treat wikipedia as a proxy child they seek glory from and try to bubblewrap every square inch of by having automated bots that go around reverting the most benign apolitical edits. You can't even correct a simple miscopied number from an obscure math paper without one of these dipshits coming in to waste everyone's time.

>>16706716
The HBD topic is under persistent attack from nannying by these retards, race and iq wouldn't be such a political problem if they weren't in complete denial that people are different and being different has consequences for their outcomes, they're like some warped atheist religious group but witthout morality or a holy book and priest to guide them

>>16706716
>race and IQ isn't science or math
Evolutionary & Developmental Cognition and Cognitive Metrology.
>without one of these dipshits coming in to waste everyone's time.
Ahem...mirror mirror...stick to Social Sciences. Oh, and I'll see you there too, because "its all just Physics" in the end.

>>16706689
No proof he did what OP claims.

>>16706640 (OP)
just sit and wait while jews eradicating white males

>>16706640 (OP)
>we

>>16706640 (OP)
Your image is explicitly trusting the science by acknowledging that his liberal arts studies don't actually make him an expert in the fields he is censoring.

>>16706640 (OP)
despite these kind of creatures existing in wikipedia and doing work, I've found many "controversial" takes, which were plainly stating the truth hold their weight and persist, that means all is not lost in there, I won't specify beyond that, just that takes, neutral takes that some people would go through hell to get silenced and banned, aren't over there. just saying

>>16706716
I am not going to read something written by some zoomie retard who thinks 30 is really old.