Statistically speaking, are scientists and STEM nerds more likely to fall into the warrior body type or the wimp body type? Is there any data to make a conclusive analysis?

>>16706787 (OP)
Of course STEM nerds skew "wimp"—the entire field is dominated by populations evolved for high verbal/mathematical intelligence at the expense of physicality. Just look at Whites and Northeast Asians: high IQ averages, low testosterone, gracile builds. Meanwhile, populations selected for strength and endurance (Africans, Polynesians) are underrepresented in academia for a reason. It’s not about oppression—it’s divergent evolutionary pressures. You can’t benchpress your way into abstract reasoning.

>>16706811
I'll bench press you into a noose pal

>>16706811
>high IQ averages, low testosterone, gracile builds. Meanwhile, populations selected for strength and endurance
What a bunch of bullshit internet memes you've been fed. There is absolutely no data to support this theory. Especially since the last time I checked Caucasian races are characterized by strength builds while African races on the other hand are characterized by dexterity and this is revealed in things like professional sports. Northeast Asians on the other hand despite also being in temperate climates have historically not had the same nutrition as the others among other factors.

>>16706811
>You can’t benchpress your way into abstract reasoning.
>mental and physical fitness false dichotomy in current year
lol
lmao even