Aether theory - "I heckin' LOVE science!" version

>>16708062 (OP)
>anything I don't understand must be fake

>>16708062 (OP)
Why do you dumb fucks over simplify your info graphs? They mean absolutely nothing at this level of abstraction. Why don't you even attempt to show how these fields exist in 3 dimensions... or the 11 you bullshitted into existence.

One of these days I'm going to come back after experiencing this shit myself and blow your mind, again.nwswn

>>16708063
Please teach us Einstein. Show us how big your brain is.

>>16708062 (OP)
>gm
property of space != medium.
>gn

>>16708062 (OP)
No. The fundamental, defining property of the aether was that it was the medium that light propagated through. In no modern theory is there a background field that light propagates through.
>B...but Lorentz aether
Yeah, sure, Lorentz made an aether theory that would only work by having the aether be forever undetectable. What's the point in having the field if you can't detect it? It might as well not be there.

>>16708062 (OP)
>its totally not the aether goy because this one random shitty experiment gave us lower values than expected (from our retarded theories) when we attempted to measure it.

>>16708063
fpbp
op is retarded as usual

>>16708063
Nah, it's just over-thinked.
You science yids try your best to explain everything without adding God into the equation so you get heckin' awesome nonsense like in OP's pic.

>>16708371
Heisenberg was a devout Lutheran. I love science and it deepens my love and faith in God. Am a Shia Muslim. Am not a physicist, am more into math and computer science. I understand the calculus of motion and how it is derived, that is about it.

This board has been invaded by religious fanatics

Sorry boys, it was likely this one failed and collapsed.

>>16708203
light propagates through the zero-point vacuum though

>>16708476
Nope.

>>16708519
>waves propagate through mediums
>except this one because gods chosen says it doesnt
got it chud

>>16708062 (OP)
>Aether theory
So the aether is the quantum fields? Is there one field that produces all the particles, or are there many different fields in the same space and time the produce the different particles?

So our reality, of this 3rd dimensional reality consists of a certain number of fields over lapping one another. So in a higher dimension there is most likely an addition or subtraction of these fields or an introduction of a brand new type of field entirely?

>>16708062 (OP)
I really do believe that time and space are seperate.

Fluctuations of Aether. Sounds reasonable. Empty space not so empty after all. Empty space believers have only one empty space, inside their cranium.

>>16708476
>>16708991
No, it doesn't. Light is self propagating. In aether theories, the aether is like water: a water wave is a "disturbance" of the medium, likewise light is a disturbance in the aether. Or in other words, light was modelled as a mechanical wave. There is no QFT where like acts like this.

>>16709152
>So the aether is the quantum fields?
first thing I thought of when I heard it. And then people go "nah, that's not it." when it fucking clearly is.

>>16708991
Yeah, this belongs to a fairly common genre of argument God's chosen people tend to deploy in a deliberate effort to confuse people. It's kinda like how Mendelian inheritance and Darwinian natural selection are empirically-verifiable and legitimate laws of nature when it comes to 8 million *other* species, yet in the case of Homo Sapiens, evolution stops at the neck and neurological characteristics have a heritability of 0.

>>16709285
So, does red shift occur in an absolute vacuum? What is causing light waves to extend if they aren't flowing through anything at all? Where is all that energy going? What is causing light to stop at... 670mph? Is it resistance through a field or just some arbitrary limit?

>>16711534
>does red shift occur in an absolute vacuum?
Yes
>What is causing light waves to extend if they aren't flowing through anything at all?
The relative motion of the source and the observer
>Where is all that energy going?
Energy isn't conserved between different frames. This is true in both classical and relativistic mechanics.
>What is causing light to stop at... 670mph?
I don't know what you mean by this

>>16708062 (OP)
You do realize that QFT is a theory created and developed mostly by Aryans, right? And that its detractors tend to be Jewish?

>>16711534
There is a bunch of interesting non-Hal Puthoff tier work in this area by serious researchers. Ulf Leonhardt comes to mind with "Electrical Engineering in General Relativity" and whoever wrote "Universe in a Droplet of Helium" about Superfluid Vacuum Theory.

>>16708991
>mediums

>>16708203
"Spacetime" is an elastic medium through which light waves propagate and gravitational time dilation is newspeak for locally variable speed of light

>>16714511
>"Spacetime" is an elastic medium through which light waves propagate
Not really.
>gravitational time dilation is newspeak for locally variable speed of light
Literally no. That's the opposite of what relativity says.

>>16708371
>You science yids try your best to explain everything without adding God into the equation
The absolute state of >>>/sci/ in 2025

>>16708443
this place was always midwit central

>>16711680
Energy is conserved between different inertial frames in classical mechanics

>>16714516
>Literally no. That's the opposite of what relativity says.
Relativity is not a person so it doesn't say anything, it's just symbols on paper describing relations between quantities

>>16708062 (OP)
Is the real world made of waves and probability and the world we experience is just a digital filter on top of an analog system/equation?