>we didn’t evolve from monkeys, we evolved from a common ancestor
why do midwits feel the need to say this in every discussion about human evolution? We clearly descended from a creature that every person would call “monkey” because that’s what they fucking look like. What else are you going to say? What IS that common ancestor, retards?

Why are you so angry? You curse all the time and call people "retards" for knowing more about something than you. Not going to give an informative answer to someone who calls me a "retard" and why should I?

>>16708810
because I share the internet with absolute retards. Atheists think they’re high and mighty because some retarded creationists ask how monkeys exist if we evolved from them, so in every single discussion where someone even mentions something similar to “evolving from monkeys” or that “whatever evolves from humans will make humans look like monkeys” etc. then you will have tons of midwits who feel the need to “correct” it and add absolutely nothing to the conversation

>>16708804 (OP)
By the time you graduate from high school in 8 years, you'll notice that most people will only argue against the dumbest arguments for any side of any discussion. This is true even if you specifically exclude a dumb argument: they will hallucinate that you didn't exclude the dumb argument and argue against it anyway. This is normal human behavior.