what is the evolutionary purpose of the female orgasm?
seems pretty pointless

>sex feels good
>has sex
>has children
>spreads the gene that makes sex feel good
are you baiting or stupid?

>>16709568 (OP)
what's the evolutionary purpose of qualia? this is literally the hard problem of concsiousness. solve it and you'll get the fields medal

>>16709576
women enjoying sex is pointless when males can just take it, like any other animal

>>16709577
seems like just a langage thing

>>16709588
yea just send your single line essay "seems like just a language thing" to the fields medal committee bro, you'll get selected for the award

>>16709578
doesnt seem very helpful to the species to have a bunch of traumatised women taking care of the next generation.

and even ignoring that:
>not all men are going to want to rape (for morality reasons)
>consensual sex + rape still means more children than just rape

>>16709568 (OP)
It's just a byproduct of the male orgams function which is the contraction of pelvic floor muscles (bulbocavernosus and ishiocavernosus) to propel semen out of the urethra.
Women have the same or similar muscles which contract when the stimulation treshhold is reached.

>>16709590
>traumatized women
social constructs aren’t evolution, try again

>>16709596
that doesnt make any sense and they aren’t even the same muscle groups

>>16709598
you think trauma is a social construction? also, the other points, idiot

>>16709568 (OP)
What is evolutionary purpose of faggots?
Same answer: byproduct of useful function in other sex.
For faggots, it's women with higher fertility.

>>16709578
Yes, because most people prefer to steal things rather than getting them for free.
Fucking retard dumbass retard

>>16709568 (OP)
It endows the zygote with a soul

>>16709578
>women enjoying sex is pointless when males can just take it
...
>*her father, brothers, and cousins block your path*
"NOT SO FAST!"


anyways, are you REALLY this cocksucking retarded that you mean just raped women with impunity throughout history? I mean, they did, but this was called "warfare" and you had to kill a decent amount of other men in your way before you could get on with the raping. And even then, what if your compatriots wanted pussy, too? You'd have to divvy it up somewhat equally and then you'd be stuck with a rapewife or two - rape: over.

>>16709889
Incredible esoteric TRVKE
This is why there's so many NPCs today.

>>16709896
no, im saying that history would be no different if they did

>>16709627
if it was normalized it wouldn’t be traumatic
other animals just spontaneously have sex all the time with 0 consequences
stop arguing from emotion

>>16709906
India is a modern example of rape being permissible. It means no sexual selection applied to males. Which means the lowest testosterone/male strength of any human race.
Women "choosing" is a way of seeing ahead of time which men are the best killers of other men.
If women never choose men, and men maintain some form of "social order", then the quality of men will degrade indefinitely.
Basically, if India went full mad max then the chadjeets could just get killing and raise the average quality of Indian men
the obverse is that a chadjeet would be careful with the genetics of his female offspring.

There's no civilzational advancement though if we just allowed women to choose, since they'll all choose the top men and the bottom criminals, meaning the middle majority of men have zero incentize to contribute to the civilization.
Fascism is a system that allows the top 85% of men in terms of "goodness" to get a waifu of their desire, which is the best balance between civilizational advancement and genetic evolution.
Not enough women you say? Fascism's civilizational advancement allows its men to have women of other societies, until fascism's lack of kvetching on genetic research eventually produces alternative solutions.

>>16709568 (OP)
It's a gift from God. I hope to give my future wife lots of orgasms.

>>16709907
>with 0 consequences
Lol. Lmao.

>in bed with girl post sex, having a cig
>how were those organism spasms, babe?
>*pulls cig* you want some more?
>girl looks uncomfortable and says no thank you

>>16709568 (OP)
Female orgasm imbues soul during procreation

>>16709568 (OP)
It isn't real. Biggest female cope ever. It's never been proven to exist. They are faking every time.

>>16709568 (OP)

Women can only orgasm or enjoy sex naturally if the man has a good dick. By having a female orgasm, women are not only rewarded for reproducing, but they are being told that they are reproducing with a high-quality man who can stay hard, is physicially fit, and attractive.

However now women just want to fuck twinks/criminals/bad boys in bdsm and get cunnilingus so yea maybe not such a good idea

>>16710142
Modern neuroses are hardly informative on instinctual behaviors.

>>16709598
4chan moment. some here are just so out of touch with reality.

>>16709568 (OP)
who cares what "evolution" has to say when atheists think its a blind, irrational force? lol

>>16710541
trans moment

>>16710142
>they are being told that they are reproducing with a high-quality man
absolute nonsense/headcanon and unscientific, there is no evolutionary purpose for the body to tell the individual that a mate is worthy or not in a post coitus manner
the copulation already happened/is happening, it means nothing

>what is the evolutionary purpose of the female orgasm?
When a woman orgasms, her cervix spasms forward and back, pushing it into sperm pooled at the end of the vagina and then withdrawing the sperm back upward into the womb.

>>16710702
Ugly dicklet mutt hands typed this post.

>>16709889
best post desu

>>16710828
W h a t.

>>16710828
yeah, this

>>16711716
I could not have been clearer and was not kidding. If you need an illustrative example, slam a donut over and over again into a bowl of cream.

>>16710702
>the copulation already happened/is happening
this stupid nigger thinks women get reliably pregnant after having sex once at a random time in their cycle and that there is no evolutionary advantage to having more than one birth lmao

"evolutionary purpose" is pseudo-science.

>>16712366
cool, now explain what any of that has to do with female orgasms

>>16710960
keep crying troon

>>16709568 (OP)
so women would want to have sex
>>16709598
trauma is very real, depression? ptsd? anxiety? out of touch 4chan moment. Also empathy exists
I think an evolutionary argument could be argued that a prehistoric woman would rather be with a man with empathy than a man without empathy.
>>16710052
if God is real, based God for creating orgasms for humans

>>16709568 (OP)
life back then was the fucking same shit as it is now faggot it wasn't some comic book rape wasteland it was the same fucking bullshit just organized differently. everything is the same, nothing ever happens, always bet on nothing. kill yourself

>>16709568 (OP)
>what is the evolutionary purpose of ........
I know this is a thread about sex, but I'm sick and tired of this misconception of evolution being so prevalent.

Evolution doesn't select traits that have positive benefits. It eliminates traits that are bad. It is a process of elimination through which the good traits are winnowed out and become more dominate.

>>16712748
>Evolution doesn't select traits that have positive benefits.
what the fuck are you talking about?

>>16709568 (OP)
To convince us to build sex robots.

>biological females with own desires and limited stamina
>vs robot girls with unlimited stamina and programmed with 1000 years of prostitute experience

>>16709568 (OP)
Same reason they all enjoy being raped. They have to enjoy some part of it to keep coming back to it.

>>16710701
Always funny when a shutin trans faggot projects onto others for being out of touch

>>16712748
>Evolution doesn't select traits that have positive benefits.
>It just doesn't.... OKAY?!

>>16710828
so orgasm's make her womb suck the cum up?

This isn't a very scientific thread :(

>>16713266
i wish ppl would stop bumping it so i can make a new Jenny thred

>>16713261
Yes. Google cervical dip.

>>16713266
"Evolution" is a humanist creation myth that violates the laws of science and has never been observed or proven with the scientific method. But since it's tax-funded, taught in government schools, and reinforced in Talmudvision; so all the goycattle conformists refuse to state "the emperor has no clothes" out of cowardice. Nothing about "evolution" is scientific, it's just the state-funded pop-sci religion; everything exploded from literally nothing, life came from a rock, our ancestors are monkeys and fish, and one day we'll explore space just like Star Trek. That's what they really believe. It's just not science.

>>16709886
But stealing is getting them for free?

t.nigger

>>16712693
>getting a dick shoved into my hole feels good
>therefore i will keep getting dicks shoved into my hole
>therefore i will increase the likelihood of getting pregnant and having children
>therefore my dick-in-the-hole-seeking genes will be more likely to persist
it's really not complicated

>>16713304
It is ironic that in the rejection of religion most people just make the government the religion.

>>16709908
That doesn't work because short women still get to reproduce if short men don't and then more short men keep being born because short women are preferred by tall men.

>>16713607
Women are shorter than men because estrogen stunts their growth spurt.
Anyways, "short women" being preferred by "tall men" just means tall men and short women will perpetuate. I don't think you understand sexually dimorphic traits.

>>16713261
This was common knowledge in the fucking Middle Ages.

>>16713611
Never assume your average modern peasant is any smarter than the average medieval peasant. One of them could feed themselves without electricity.

>>16709568 (OP)
what is the evolutionary purpose of OP?
seems pretty pointless

>>16713610
I don't think you understand autosomal non sexually dimorphic traits..
Women are 8% shorter than men. Short women are way shorter than that.

>>16709568 (OP)
In humans? It increases reproductive opportunities, leading to better outcomes overall.

>>16709568 (OP)
Byproducts aren’t the unfolding of metaphysics.

>>16709568 (OP)
it's like male nipples. it's too complicated for DNA to evolve it away from women so they just get to have it too