>>16710137t. self-incriminator
My "official" FS score was 126 on zero sleep, ambiguous g probably in the 130s although I'm not a very regular poster. It is true 4chan is shockingly retarded. Almost any argument that doesn't involve expertise I lack, I could easily find the central point, contrast it to reality and fill the character limit with careful explication. Whenever I make those kind of bigposts on imageboards, it makes me less likely to get a response and if I do, it's just more simple, angry whining.
The question relevant to this thread is which is better: the agreeable smart person or the disagreeable smart person? Who is right? Who has better moral principles? I think the kind of asshole described in OP is overreactive and has poor taste in conversation. What's so bad about being a dumbass? It's realistic to expect that people will be stupid; it's effectively just a fact to be accepted. Why take pleasure in bullying them when the enjoyment of peace and kindness is purer and not so morally questionable?