Why is nothing going on in science in the last decades?

humans are pieces of shit regardless of IQ or education level so they gatekeep shit for petty reasons, usually.

stupid opinion

>>16710658
>oh, we confirmed existence of particle that was predicted 50 years ago
>and no, this knowledge has no practical use
>everything is exactly the same as before said confirmation
Fuck off.

>>16710648 (OP)
Ah yes, Stagnation:
https://wiki.installgentoo.com/wiki/Stagnation

>>16710648 (OP)
New developments happen all the time. The US Patent Office grants almost a hundred design patents for new technology every year. You just don't notice because new tech has become so ubiquitous that all the new developments barely register.

>>16710648 (OP)
By design.
Mainstream science go any further /sci/'s gonna turn into /x/.

>>16710648 (OP)
because you are too stupid to read frontier pushing papers :^)

>>16711483
That's correct and based.

>>16710648 (OP)
Why is she so hot???

>>16710648 (OP)
did she get work done?
in her newer videos she looks bogged

>>16711821
yes she got a booba and a pussa job

>>16710648 (OP)
I recommend reading frontier scientific papers. Scientists have been working quite a while on very groundbreaking technology that simply had a longer gestation period due to its sheer complexity.

AI, gene editing, cures and treatments for AIDS, cancer, full self-driving, actual viable solar technology, etc.these are all technologies that have finally started to gain serious ground in the last three or so years.

The reason you haven't heard about more of the science is because it's harder to acces when results have not yet been made in the market en masse.

However, all of these technologies are just now being released to the public or are beginning to enter serious human trials, so expect far more innovations in the next ten years than we have had in many years priot (this has already started as of the early 2020s', so perhaps even less time). Also, if you wanna keep up with science better in a casual search engine type way without having to sift through popsci articles and long and drawn out YouTube videos, just ask Grok. Better than Google for general info collection imo.

The future is looking bright

>>16710648 (OP)
Well if we had the superconducting super collider we could have found the supersymmetric particles according to Ronald Reagan.

>>16712003
>actual viable solar technology
Quick rundown?

>>16710648 (OP)

>>16712003
ESL-coded post saar

>>16710648 (OP)
thirdies

>>16710648 (OP)
Bro hasn't heard solar energy activated pace makers which also have become miniaturized

>>16710648 (OP)
because it has become a probability speculating. real world applicationless, math hallucination storytelling about "quantum physics"
that is what happens if you sacrifice Popperian rigorous epistemology. to gain more illusion of progress

1900s started faux science. Empty space? Where do electron get all photons?!! Fron it's pocket? Fuck you big fuck youm