If space and time are just different axes in the same coordinate system then they should be measured in the same units. How many seconds are in a kilometer?

>>16711917 (OP)
>just different axes in the same coordinate system then they should be measured in the same units
bro... 1 x =/= 1 y. It's more like f(x) = y. I mean this is so basic I struggle explaining it. A unit of x isn't inherently the same as a unit of y.

>>16711917 (OP)
>then they should be measured in the same units
Time is a measure of distance per time.

https://youtu.be/aRtKSHvT2-c

>>16711917 (OP)
about 3.3×10^6 seconds

>>16711921
The measurement of distance per time is speed, retard.

>>16711917 (OP)
It is weird that 3 out of 4 dimensions have the same units. Really nogs the jog, I mean spot the odd one out.

>>16712047
>https://youtu.be/aRtKSHvT2-c
Spacial Displacement = Temoral Duration. Time = Space. A vector of length.
>is speed
Velocity.
>>16711917 (OP)
>How many seconds are in a kilometer?
"A longitudinal arc minute, at the equator, is approximately 1.85 kilometers."
You should be able to solve this.

light-seconds, light-weeks, light-years, and so on are valid units of measurement

>>16712388
But they are all geocentric units of measure. Imagine measuring lengths in fundemental Physics in reeds...fucking bananas.

>>16711917 (OP)
Our time dimension is just a spatial direction we have lost control of due to falling into a 4D black hole.

>>16711917 (OP)
Normalize c=1 (ie every derivative of a four-vector with respect to proper time is unital).
/thread

>>16711917 (OP)
>How many seconds are in a kilometer?
exactly how many you want based on...time (forward progression; how you determine that progression is entirely on you)

>>16711943
only from the perspective of light

>>16712536
No. From the perspective of light, a kilometer is 0 seconds, instant.

>>16711917 (OP)
To break down a dual coordinate system of an axis that results in a differential of space or time, creates the need for implied motion.

Let's make this more sensible and just replace space and time with axis vector 1 and axis vector 2.

A differential to resolve differences between V1 and V2 must exist, to give each identity unique against the other.

There is no grand reference frame separating these things with an identity.

The implied difference, in the case of space and time is motion, but motion in our V1-V2 line, is not movement between points, but the only metric we have to compare V1 and V2.

How many seconds are in a kilometer?
Answering this question with accuracy, per human knowledge at this point, you would calculate a light kilometer.

Why?
Light is the maximum limit of identifiers allowed between the V1-V2 comparison.

>It's the most raw form of motion for space-time comparison.

If we can genuinely break it down further, we don't know how yet.

Only higher order hypotheticals exist in the land of comparing space and time, beyond the light barriers.

So, study the box as we see it today, or try to predict what we might find out about the box tomorrow.

Either way, with space and time, the comparative differential that "works" is using light as our base motion reference.
If it's all strings, or branes, or higher dimensional manifolds, or God, whatever... We don't actually know any of that yet, so the answer for you is a light kilometer.

4D person here. I laterally move 7 seconds when I find I am in your way.

>>16711917 (OP)
Time units are space units multiplied by -i.
m = -i • s • k, for some scaling constant k.
-ik is the "coefficient of spaciotemporality" or "coefficient of temporalspaciality". I can never remember.