You're a retard if you think any other measurements of intelligence is nonsensical if it doesn't involve IQ tests, math, and physics.

>>16712134 (OP)
>intelligence tests
You've made the same thread some 10 times in the past month. Get a life, loser.

>>16712136
>tracking a specific user's posts within the past month
>believes his own delusions that he's accurately tracking it and not just babbling towards a random internet stranger
>yet still has the audacity to tell me to get a life

Wow man, you're really winning at life.

>>16712134 (OP)
Wow another thread about intelligence so original. How about making a thread about maths or physics instead of boring us with garbage.

>>16712168
having scored high on an online IQ test is the only time anon ever felt any sense of superiority, so he clings to it like his life depends on it because it actually does

without being able to sit in his room and jerk off to the thought of being smarter than chad, he would have roped long ago

>>16712168
It's funny, isn't it? That he says math and physics are indicators of intelligence, yet is unable to contribute any math of physics threads.

>>16712134 (OP)
history has many examples of the best test takers. practical peoples that do things kneel before them.

You're a retard if you think that intelligence tests test intelligence.

>ESL
>Death Note
Indian detected; opinion discarded.

>>16713433
What if they do but not in the way they think, what if your mom was smart

>>16712134 (OP)
You're a retard if you don't not think that the opposite of the invalidate nature of intelligence tests is accepted.

>>16712134 (OP)
From my experience those best at math are the dumbest fuckers alive and have no reasoning capacity. I think there's a good reason academia has tried to turn students into glorified calculators.

>>16713722
That tickles my ego, however, source?

>>16713947
Just personal experience as a scientist. I encounter "scientists" all the time who don't know basic shit about their own field. But you better believe they can do calculus! If you watch actual scientists on jewtube you see this a lot. I remember watching a pre-recorded paleontology stream with a bunch of youngish (under 40) paleontologists and one just came out and said he was half way through a master's degree before he realized that "junior synonym" isn't a name that applies to a juvenile of a species. Another time I saw a stream from a paleontologist that was naming a new dinosaur from their home state. They literally didn't even know all the dinosaurs in that family FROM THEIR OWN STATE. I can recite just about every dinosaur in that family globally off the top of my head more or less in chronological order. I never went to college for it.

Colleges are getting to that point where people that attend them know LESS about a given field than the man off the street does. But they are ALL well-versed in the latest hippie politics.

>>16712134 (OP)
>why won't girls let me fuck them?
>my intellect is superior to those brutes!
>perhaps if I concoct a dastardly strategem to entice their feminine wives, they see observe me the superior being...

picrel, you are going to be the first man on Mars, and this guy is going to keep every girl you thought you were impressing with your effort nice and pregnant for you

In a face-to-face conversation, it is obvious to an intelligent person whether the other person is dim or bright. Like, really obvious. Midwits lack this instant, innate perception and tend to underestimate genius and overestimate average cognitive ability.

IQ attempts to quantify pattern recognition. Regardless of the score, some people perceive patterns in complex inputs with remarkable easy and speed, others have to break things down into simpler parts and employ mental models to deduce patterns, and still others can barely recognize patterns when explained to them, all as a fundamental consequence of their neurological makeup.

Most people are not bright. They never will be.

>>16713988
is that 400 absences in one school term (so average of 80 absences per course), or 400 absences across 4 years (100 per year) and completely missing the day for an average of 50 per term? if it's the latter, i accrued 30+ absences every term and still ended up with good grades