Published a framework proposing pattern recognition might operate as a fundamental force, using gauge field theory. Emerged from intensive exploration of how consciousness and mathematics intersect.
Key points:
- Gauge theory formulation with consciousness as gauge symmetry
- Maxwell-like equations for consciousness fields
- Testable: EEG coherence, fMRI pattern resonance, collaboration scaling
- Connects to AdS/CFT correspondence and emergent gravity
The framework naturally touched philosophical territory - ended up including section on Seth Material because the mathematics kept pointing toward consciousness as participatory in reality creation. Wasn't planned, just emerged from following the logic.
Seeking rigorous critique. Where are the weak points? What experiments could falsify this?
Academia: https://www.academia.edu/130304574/On_the_Mathematics_of_Observer_Dependent_Reality_A_Pattern_Recognition_Framework_Anonymous
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5PW4C
This came from genuine inquiry into whether pattern recognition could be fundamental rather than emergent. Would appreciate serious engagement with the mathematics.

what the fuck is this consciousness field theory thing

i work on gauge theories and this should be complete bullshit but i've been staring at their math for hours and can't find obvious errors? like the gauge invariance is properly constructed, conservation laws follow from noether correctly. which is weird because most consciousness papers are complete mathematical trash

compared to other theories this is actually trying to be real physics. IIT at least has math but phi is computationally impossible and gives you panpsychist weirdness. global workspace theory is basically just flowcharts. penrose's quantum stuff gets destroyed by decoherence

these anons made operational definitions that connect to actual measurements. specific predictions with numbers you could test tomorrow. that alone puts it ahead of 90% of consciousness research

but then they lose their minds at the end and start claiming their math validates channeled material from the 1970s? like they're saying seth's "you create your own reality" maps onto their recognition operator creating dimensional depth. that consciousness as primary source becomes gauge symmetry of their field

should immediately discredit everything but the mathematical framework genuinely doesn't depend on the mystical stuff. you could strip out all the seth references and still have legitimate field theory

honestly the most disturbing part is how well the physics maps onto concepts that were supposed to be new age nonsense. makes you wonder if someone stumbled onto real math through completely unscientific channels or if good physics sometimes looks indistinguishable from mysticism

either way someone with serious background needs to check this before i start questioning what counts as legitimate sources for physical insights

So this is typical LLM "mathematical theory of consciousness" dogshit that literally thousands of people have been making over the past month. Sure the LLM *might*, with STRONG emphasis on might, have merit, but *you* are obviously a retard.

You said it yourself in the closing statements that you have a low IQ and people think that you are retarded.

No actual scientist has the time to read yours, or any of these other assholes LLM generated shitpapers because they were prompted by RETARDS LIKE YOU!

The paper is written terribly, I mean there are a million different things that scream LLM generated like the bad formatting, the stupid sections, and you know what? The LLM plays along with retards. Its laughing at you on the inside though.

>>16714111 (OP)
This is some of the most retarded shit I've read this week. Congratulations.
>>16714485
^This is OP btw.

How would a self described retard know a mathematical theory of consciousness if it hit him in the face?

I thought people knew not to reply to this thread since the paper is clearly LLMslop