x=x

x=^)

>>16715078 (OP)
law of identity

>>16715118
this is what I got after simplifying

>>16715118
identity has destroyed sociology, psychology, biology, politics, climate science, and now mathematics and logic as well? it's so fucking over

>>16715139
take your meds

0=1

>>16715078 (OP)
x~x

>>16715078 (OP)
>x=x
Proof?

>>16715078 (OP)
What's wrong pepe?

>>16715238
suppose x=/=x
then there must be a non-zero y for which: x+y=x
by rearranging that equality, we get y=0
but this contradicts with y being non-zero
so x=x

>>16715262
>then there must be a non-zero y for which: x+y=x
proof?

>>16715295
Such a proof is trivial. If x is not x and x is a real number than there exists y which represents the distance between x and x, and that y ought to be 0, since x is x. []

1/0=

>>16715465
Not necessarily untrue

>>16715118
reflexive relation

>>16715184
>0=1
>therefore i have a 12 inch johnson
>q.e.d.

Zero Does not Equal One.?

Might Somehow, but nah to n.a.a and n.h.a. and n.d.a.

>>16715262
You’re assuming there’s an algebra on whatever set you’re working with.

>>16715702
Let zero equal one.

>>16715078 (OP)
When I was in 7th grade, a math tutor or tester gave me a one-on-one math test, and one of the questions he asked me to answer was: "x = ?"
I said, that I didn't know, what x is equal to.
After a while, he wrote "x" after the "=" and said, that x is equal to x.
I thought, that the question was unfair or not good.

>>16715465
>1/0=
infinity

>>16716396
I simply can not.

>>16718015
ye

>>16715184
trivial ring