Anonymous
7/5/2025, 5:45:58 AM No.16716283
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmOfwFHBu_o
Why is science yet to figure out what the cause of ball lighting is?
Why is science yet to figure out what the cause of ball lighting is?
Replies:
Thread 16716283 - /sci/ [Archived: 390 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/5/2025, 6:01:06 AM No.16716292
>>16716283 (OP)
It's just an angel that forgot to phase shift out of our perceptible dimension(s). This is why they seemingly break the laws of physics... because they comply with higher-dimensional physics unknown to science.
>inb4 >>/x/
go ahead. fucking explain ball lighting. do it.
It's just an angel that forgot to phase shift out of our perceptible dimension(s). This is why they seemingly break the laws of physics... because they comply with higher-dimensional physics unknown to science.
>inb4 >>/x/
go ahead. fucking explain ball lighting. do it.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/5/2025, 7:40:34 AM No.16716348
>>16716283 (OP)
Please review "stratification." Arc propagation along stratified electromagnetic potential shouldn't be difficult to figure out.
Please review "stratification." Arc propagation along stratified electromagnetic potential shouldn't be difficult to figure out.
Anonymous
7/6/2025, 6:07:04 AM No.16717172
Anonymous
7/6/2025, 6:10:59 AM No.16717178
>>16716283 (OP)
We might have already found out. It could be vaporized dirt silicone, iron and other sediments
We might have already found out. It could be vaporized dirt silicone, iron and other sediments
Anonymous
7/6/2025, 6:19:36 AM No.16717190
>>16716283 (OP)
I'd really like to believe it's not a hoax, but I'm still skeptical.
I'd really like to believe it's not a hoax, but I'm still skeptical.
Anonymous
7/7/2025, 1:03:41 PM No.16718450
>>16716292
>go ahead. fucking explain ball lighting. do it.
Well it's lightning, electricity, in the form of a sphere.
No but seriously, we don't know for sure, but there's theories and even lab experiments that give us clues.
It could be vaporized silicon. Scientists managed to recreate ball lightning like phenomenae in lab settings.
It's not 100% the same but it's pretty close.There's other theories, but it probably involved silicon, oxygen and other elements.
>go ahead. fucking explain ball lighting. do it.
Well it's lightning, electricity, in the form of a sphere.
No but seriously, we don't know for sure, but there's theories and even lab experiments that give us clues.
It could be vaporized silicon. Scientists managed to recreate ball lightning like phenomenae in lab settings.
It's not 100% the same but it's pretty close.There's other theories, but it probably involved silicon, oxygen and other elements.
Anonymous
7/7/2025, 7:10:10 PM No.16718682
>>16716283 (OP)
That's a UAP
That's a UAP
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 9:00:14 AM No.16720169
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 3:08:40 PM No.16720352
>>16716283 (OP)
>>16720191
Honestly, this is probably fake.
>>16716292
But sure, I'll offer an explanation. You can see there's a lot of wind and water vapor in this system. Assuming the video isn't just fake, they claim a bolt of lightning generated the ball lightning. If this is real, the lightning could have simply been particularly powerful and hit a good spot, vaporized a decent chunk of water and converted it to plasma, and the high winds could have done their juju to help a magnetic field become temporarily cohesive until the energy in the ball ran out, at which point, *poof*.
>>16720191
Honestly, this is probably fake.
>>16716292
But sure, I'll offer an explanation. You can see there's a lot of wind and water vapor in this system. Assuming the video isn't just fake, they claim a bolt of lightning generated the ball lightning. If this is real, the lightning could have simply been particularly powerful and hit a good spot, vaporized a decent chunk of water and converted it to plasma, and the high winds could have done their juju to help a magnetic field become temporarily cohesive until the energy in the ball ran out, at which point, *poof*.