A physics professor was talking about an app which splits the universe so you can make one decision in one universe and another decision in the other universe.

https://www.reddit.com/r/UniverseSplitter/comments/i969mq/have_you_guys_been_experiencing_mandela/

Some people who have used the app claim to have had more Mandela effects or deja vu. Is this likely to be the case and can universes interact with one another?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1_ZsDBMPQMI

>People are reporting misremembering shit.
It's nothing.

>>16717276
Is it though?
What about this https://nypost.com/2020/05/19/nasa-finds-evidence-of-parallel-universe-where-time-runs-backward-report/

How long it takes to work?

>>16717278
The app itself is like a minute per split but I don't know about the universe interacting part

Bump

>>16717259 (OP)
Bump, forgot i bought this app

>>16717537
>>16717276
there's a study on the Mandela effect and toto effect by a PHD and it's pretty damning that it's real
All the medical professionals misremembering the right blood type seems really odd
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oe65g0K8ePc

>>16717550
carl jung understood the collective unconscious as the origin of the mandela effect. when one person misremembers an event, it's an error. when said individual asserts this misremembered event absolutely happened, they are a kook. when many individuals (all of whom talk to each other) misremember an event, we say they influenced each others opinions until they settled on the false truth. we conclude they are all humans, and some placated their friends.

and when a collective of independent observers, separated by generations, language, culture, and space have no communication with each other and all independently "misremember" the same event, we shrug and say "this is weird - it's the mandela effect!" in reality, they're all experiencing the same excitation of the collective unconscious. "science" hates acknowledging this, because it begs the question: what causes the excitations?

the natural conclusion to draw is one of two possibilities. the unifying aspect between both possibilities is that all (or some) brains are connected to each other by some fields. in the first interpretation, individual brains can cause excitations in the field and subconsciously influence other brains. this is a pill no scientist wishes to swallow. the alternative is that some events, independent of the individual brains, intrinsic to the field itself causes the individual brains to respond to the stimulus. this is again a pill scientists do not wish to swallow, since it leads to supernatural phenomena (there are of course random explanations, but this is hard to square with the specificity the mandela effect has to humans... why would people randomly think mandela was dead?)

>>16717259 (OP)
>Another universe totally just split off! Trust me, bro!
May we see it?

>>16717554 (me)
it is also worth noting that this is a topic scientists will not touch with a ten foot pole because consciousness has layers. there is consciousness, subconscious, unconscious and the collective unconscious.

neuroscientists cannot come to a conclusion on what consciousness even is, let alone what subconsciousness is meant to represent. julian jaynes argued consciousness arose recently, and we have historical records to see the evolution of this. the greeks at the time of iliad, for example, were argued to lack consciousness because they had a bicameral mind.

an unsavory conclusion to draw is that some civilizations today, and potentially individuals within first world civilizations lack consciousness still. again, scientists will never touch this topic. meaning we're in the dark on whether these people who lack consciousness are more attuned to the collective unconscious, or completely detached from it. do you need consciousness to be influenced by the collective unconscious? unknown.

>>16717558
Can you see dark matter?

>It's the only paradox-free method of merging the closed timelike curves (CTCs) allowed by the general theory of relativity with the effects of quantum mechanics without resorting to fudge factors or hacks, the many worlds interpretation (MWI) is the blatantly correct interpretation of quantum mechanical effects.

>In short, the MWI of quantum mechanics states that while an individual observer will see a statistically normative distribution of outcomes from interactions of matter and energy, that distribution is a byproduct of all possible states being resultant while the probability of an outcome maps to the percentage of connected worldlines in which that particular result occurs.

Bump

>>16717550
>ehehe guys i am phd i wrote a DISSERTATION ok?
>no i won't tell you the field or the school
>league of legends in the taskbar

>>16717550
>40% of MDs do not understand blood types
holy fucking sodomize me with a medieval flail
not surprising but horrifying
nobody would get this wrong if they actually understood WHY O- blood is compatible, is this american education at work or just people being retarded?

>>16717259 (OP)
Man this app is still running? I remember carroll talking about it over a decade ago.

>>16717853
Why can't it be the Mandela effect?


>>16717858
Yes

>While the Déjà vu and Intuition sections of this document detail the individualistic effects of this theory, the Mandela effect is largely an externally-derived effect from the context of an individual. This is more of an artifact of the meta-morphology surrounding an individual than the individual themselves. While morphological similarity connects moments, this linking is done from the perspective of every particle in the multiverse with a nearly inverse square drop-off as defined in the Infinite Universe section of this document. This fluidity of connection between moments shared by surrounding matter ensure that there is no hard and fixed "past" for a given moment as defined in the Temporal Mechanics section of this document, and in turn the things which aren't critical to the overall morphology of the brain of an individual (essentially the things they don't "care" about) are malleable. Reality changes constantly around us, but if no connection is made to the inner state of an individual it becomes nonce. The Mandela effect occurs at the boundary of the things closely coupled to our perspective of reality and those things which are entirely nonce and subject to collision as a result.

https://quatism.com/theory.htm

Bump

>>16717259 (OP)
This is insanely retarded.
Many worlds theory does not imply the existence of parallel universes in the way a lot of people interpret it. They aren't literally places you can go or be in.
Even if it did, there's no reason to think your memories would somehow carry over. This "parallel you" who's mind your consciousness would have stepped into would have existed in that parallel universe and have all memories associated with living in that timeline.

Not to mention the universes would constantly be splitting with or without the app and there's no reason having the app on your phone is any different from having it on anyone else's phone.

>>16717558
Yea, just look at OPs image, the graph is on the right half.

>>16717259 (OP)
> Some people who have used the app claim to have had more Mandela effects or deja vu

this is just redditors experiencing redditor shit