>>16717475 (OP)Morphic resonance is a quite reasonable idea if one views it from a cybernetic standpoint. Nevertheless, barely anyone will take it seriously without at least some explanation based on physical facts we already know of, so I've attempted to find one at least parametricly.
Given:
-S surrounding and object x, where
S:has small constant supply of gray noise, and has the ability
to retain echoed noise.
x: acceptor of some noise, but not all, destabilised by noise it accepts
-x recieves noise, echoes most of it, but taking in the one on the
own frequenzy of x
-surrounding S now has noise, with x characteristics shaped hole in it
-this hole means existence for other x- or x like things is easier
-similar x-es share the load while unique things struggle alone
-in case of an other object y, that is only different from x in charactersitics:
y's ease of noiseload is proportional to the likeness of x's characteristics
-x-es create an "inertia" in the noise simply by continously existing and cleaning
their characteristic noise
-thus y being more x-like, and being selected towards x is more likely
-if noise energises but not destroys this effect is even more profound
-such noises and resonance can be Earth's EM field, which resonates with
the Schumann resonance along with it's overtones, yielding the Furier transform
of things and as such carrying arbitrary characteristics.
An other example may be the 1s^2 electrons that all atomic bodies, but hidrogen share
in a closed, spheric similar fashion.
