So why not? - /sci/ (#16718100) [Archived: 422 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/7/2025, 3:03:40 AM No.16718100
S_engine
S_engine
md5: 1b888fa90e5fb1fd78659684b1b2be40🔍
Why not just bury half of a serling engine underground, then let the natural heat difference between the underground and above ground sections to run the engine, you could generate nearly "free" energy with this.
Replies: >>16718298 >>16718299 >>16718745
Anonymous
7/7/2025, 3:39:43 AM No.16718123
1710096416146936
1710096416146936
md5: 4b0d8ffbaef53b1ab67cd5c874fcf779🔍
>he knows
Anonymous
7/7/2025, 7:45:48 AM No.16718295
cave diving
cave diving
md5: 72dc9a3bd4882b054b6197570abeacfc🔍
OTEC makes a bit more sense because ocean currents carry the heat whereas the geothermal needs a km of pipes.
Anonymous
7/7/2025, 7:50:00 AM No.16718298
>>16718100 (OP)
Natural heat difference stops being a heat difference really fast when you install a heat engine in the ground.
Replies: >>16718728
Anonymous
7/7/2025, 7:55:55 AM No.16718299
>>16718100 (OP)
Congratulations. You just invented geothermal energy. If only there were a billion dollar industry that was motivated to do basically what you're describing but more efficiently.
Anonymous
7/7/2025, 9:25:56 AM No.16718326
I hate entropy so much its unreal
Anonymous
7/7/2025, 8:15:09 PM No.16718728
>>16718298
The underground portion will be naturally cooler while the upper portion is heated by the sun then due to residual heat run although at reduced capacity. It might not make much power but it theoretically would still make power just using natural energy to run.
Anonymous
7/7/2025, 8:44:44 PM No.16718745
>>16718100 (OP)
Build it then, smartguy.