Dangerous levels of radiation - /sci/ (#16719765) [Archived: 393 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/8/2025, 10:10:29 PM No.16719765
8720bdf5683f645203258479b7f36ce11b254a84
8720bdf5683f645203258479b7f36ce11b254a84
md5: 4b0cf693a7416ce2561357b5cef96619🔍
What kBq/m^2 amount is dangerous?
I've lived in Finland - in the red area - for 35 years now.

It pisses me off to realize that I've been suckin up that sweet Russian competence in radiation form for my whole life and the media refuses to talk about it because they don't want to anger Russians.
Replies: >>16719787 >>16719789
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 10:14:57 PM No.16719768
5G towers are more dangerous

They're not revealing the truth because of how much money is invested in Internet
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 10:49:03 PM No.16719787
>>16719765 (OP)
You get more radiation from the Radon in the air living in that zone than you get from the fallout. Especially since you know you weren't actually born when Chernobyl happened and that radiation fell down.
Replies: >>16719790
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 10:50:28 PM No.16719789
>>16719765 (OP)
It's practically nothing. Even 100 kBq/m^2 is only .32 mSv/year while the average background dose for Finland is 5.9 mSv/year - literally only a 5% increase over living in the grey region. This is way below any dose rate that has any sort of measurable effects.
Replies: >>16719807
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 10:50:44 PM No.16719790
>>16719787
Anon I was born a few years after the incident and I have 8 toes.
Anonymous
7/8/2025, 11:17:55 PM No.16719807
>>16719789
you can go several times this yearly dose and it won't do anything