Men went to the Moon. Proof of that is that you can see what was left there by NASA using a telescope. This is irrefutable.

I find it sweet that man came on top of the Moon in 69.

>>16720640 (OP)
good try glow nigger

>telescope
lmao no you can't

>>16720683
yeah you can

>>16720687
You do not get that resolution with an earth based telescope. It's an orbiter pic. Me knows that they were there for two reasons. 1. Fakes (nearly everything they vomit in your brain) will never questioned by media. 2. Know people who measured the communication phase shift (moon orbit and earth rotation included). German radio amateurs, the most crazy techfreaks thinkable. But of morale and honesty level no UShitholer can imagine.

>>16720687
kek this blurry mess is proof to you?
do you believe in ufos flying over the east coast too perhaps? bigfoot?

I don't believe anything

>>16720717
>>16720721
India took pictures of the pieces of the lunar landers that are still on the Moon with their probe thing. Are they in on the conspiracy, too?

>>16720766
While I think the moon hoaxers are morons with self esteem issues, I wouldn't use anything India produces as valid evidence of anything.

>>16720640 (OP)
This is like atheists screaming that there is no god.
No one really cares

>>16720766
Even if the pictures aren't fabricated, the presence of some object on the moon does not indicate man landing on the moon. Many robots have landed on the moon.
In general, the claim that a given picture or film is conclusive of a fact is invalid. There is film of them faking their distance from the Earth two days into their supposed voyage to the moon.
The best thing NASA could do would be to land on the moon again. And take adequate high definition film and photographs. And then have that mission successfully return to Earth so the originals can be inspected without data compression and shrinking. Until that time, they never did it and the whole thing is a facade orchestrated by malevolent actors bent on destroying the West.
This is a very clear requirement. The reproduction and transmission of shitty inferior images will not be an adequate claim that they got there. Nobody cares about a visit to moonGPT.

What will moon landing denier say when Americans and Chineses will land on the moon within the next 5 years? AI-generated fakes?

>>16720841
They brought all the evidence there with them to cover up that it wasn't possible until now.

>>16720852
>no youre the tranny
Meanwhile the moon landing was brought to you by the same shylocks that are responsible for grooming. Looks like a screen cap can't stay on point for a few sentences. Definitely not a sign of an obvious astroturf.

>>16720687
>>16720766
Doesn't prove men went to the moon, at best it just proves there were drones on the moon.

The moon is fake and gay. The Earth is flat. Space is fake and gay. God is real. Sneed.

>>16720766
Imagine seeing a pic like this but it's of a planet we just discovered.

>>16720826
>There is film of them faking their distance from the Earth two days into their supposed voyage to the moon.
no there isn't. you just fell for another one of Bart Sibrels lies.
https://www.moonhoaxdebunked.com/2017/07/611-did-astronauts-fake-tv-footage-of.html

> And take adequate high definition film and photographs.
they took tens of thousands of very high definition photos (about 150MP equivalent in the black and white shots) and loads of 16mm film footage, yet the moonhoax dummies call it all fake because they dont understand how shadows work.

>>16720766
>Are they in on the conspiracy, too?
How many countries played a part of the Corona conspiracy?

>>16720766
What I mean I don't believe anything I'm referring to both sides. I'm agnostic and I don't really care that much if we went on the moon.

>>16721252
and how many professionals in the medical field came out against all of that crap? Remeber the Great Barrington Declaration, and all the doctors and nurses who risked their careers to support it?
Compare that the number of engineers and scientists etc etc who came out saying that the moonlandings were faked..oh, thats right, zero.

>>16720640 (OP)
k pics of the flag as of today

>>16720640 (OP)
AND the boot step marks around it

>>16721264
>how many professionals in the medical field came out against all of that crap
Very few. Miniscule, really...considering every department, agency, and advocacy group sided with it. Every university and research lab as well.
>Great Barrington Declaration
THREE DOCTORS?!?@ HOLY MOLEY!!
>Sunetra Gupta
>Jay Bhattacharya
>Martin Kulldorff
Its a good thing for Martin that any proceeding legal rammifications against them would have be two thirds racist and white supremacist Naziism hate speech and systemic oppression.

>>16721273
what a load of shit anon. about 12000 scientists signed that, and it was just one memorable sign of opposition to the covid lockdowns and vaccine.

wheres the outpouring of whistleblowers exposing the huge moonhoax fake? There isn't any and there never was, other than a few cranks who dont know what they are talking about and have to tell lies to make their points.

>>16720640 (OP)
Crazy that they actually lost the technology to get us there after the cold war ended.

>>16721316
>lost the technology
they quit funding the companies building it all long before that unfortunately. if your manned lunar program takes a 40 year break it takes some time and effort, not to mention consistent funding, to upgrade all the equipment to modern standards and expanded mission profiles.

>>16721281
>While the authors' website claims that over 14,000 scientists, 40,000 medical practitioners, and more than 800,000 members of the public signed the declaration,[46][47] this list—which anyone could sign online and which required merely clicking a checkbox to claim the status of "scientist"—contains some evidently-fake names, including: "Mr Banana Rama", "Harold Shipman", and "Prof Cominic Dummings".
Dont ever post at me or my collusion rapport.

>>16721384
>some fake names mean the entire list is fake
typical moonhoaxfaggotry response. you guys will reject and undermine anything if it disagrees with your preferred idea. You realize that you're quoting media which fully and completely mocks anyone who was against lockdowns and the vaxx, right?
you have no standards and, still, no list of scientists and engineers coming out against the moonlandings. thats the main thing to keep in mind here.

>>16720640 (OP)
China is going there everyday, they've seen it All,. And they're doing more than we ever did.

>>16720640 (OP)
Nice fake Image op.

Here's the original unedited version

what's that, no flag clear pictures + footsteps? supsicious, I would say

>>16720766
if anything that proves men never did go to the moon lol
how did they get back allegedly if their rocket is still there? lmao.

>>16720640 (OP)
Since fiction tends to reveal the truth let me remind you that Rammstein made a music video called Amerika.

>>16721854
you cant be serious

>>16721252
what does corona have to do with the moon landing trumpanzee retard?

>>16720826
>The best thing NASA could do...
pointless, look up what happened with the flattards who actually went to antarctica with all the tech+live streaming(spoiler: satan faked reality locally)

>>16722243
in the conspiracy mind, its all connected.
wooooah

>>16722243
>>16722282
the moonhoaxies like to mention the worldwide collaboration in response to covid as an example of how a conspiracy can be maintained by large number of people as if it somehow supports their claim that everyone is lying about the moonlandings (and the shape of the earth, for many of them).

its a bad example though, as i explained above, because of the number of whistleblowers and general opposing medical professionals etc, for which there is no comparison within the spaceflight and engineering professions. not one.

Covid was real.

>>16720640 (OP)
>Men went to the Moon. Proof of that is that you can see what was left there by NASA using a telescope.
No, the most which man-made things on the Moon prove, is that those things went there.
Placed there by remote-controlled machines.
But I doubt, that a telescope shows anything man-made on the Moon.
You're a propagandist.

>>16725590
would
>prove

Frankly, the best evidence is how little effort they put into proving it. Just some video sent back to earth and some rocks.

If it were all some sort of ruse, you'd think they'd put more effort into fabricating evidence. Instead, they focused their efforts on actually putting people on the moon.

>>16721873
https://i.4cdn.org/gif/1752640623649428.webm
LMAO

>>16720640 (OP)
They're genuine retards that want to feel special in lieu of focusing of actual conspiracies, like the President and Congress's ongoing cover up of Epstein.

>>16725600
so what is it you dont understand about that which makes you instantly think its fake?

>>16721546
this
OP is a faggot and so are you all who bumped this trash thread

i'm just glad we did all that moon stuff back when we were still a proper country. in current year they'd have made sure the first person to step on the moon was a black woman and the rest of the crew would have been other flavors of dei

>>16725889
very true. there was one black who nearly made the astronaut program but they cut him out during selection. of course he and his fellow blacks called it out as racism but the fact is he was just out classed by the other guys. not that he wasn't a good pilot etc, but just not in the same league.